Trade Cases
Will Section 232 be a Bombshell or a Bust? We’ll Know Soon
Written by Tim Triplett
January 9, 2018
Anticipation is building over the Commerce Department’s Section 232 report, which is finally due to the White House in the next few days. Will its recommendations to the president on trade action to protect the national security prove to be a bombshell or a bust?
Proponents of new tariffs or quotas on steel imports have taken their case to the Twittersphere in recent days (where this particular president may well spot them). “If the flood of imports drives our steel producers out of business, the U.S. will become dangerously dependent on unreliable foreign suppliers for the steel that is critical to our national defense and infrastructure. #AmericaSteelStrong,” posted the American Iron and Steel Institute. “It is the overall financial health of U.S. steel producers, and not simply the profitability of their defense business, that is essential to their ability to be reliable defense suppliers.” #AmericaSteelStrong,” tweeted ArcelorMittal, to cite just a couple of examples.
Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz points out that the statutory deadline for the Commerce report is Monday, Jan. 15, which is a federal holiday (Martin Luther King Day). So, technically, the latest the president can receive the report is the first business day after the deadline, Tuesday, Jan. 16. “It could happen on Sunday, the 14th, especially if it is a nonevent because no remedy is forthcoming, drawing less attention from the Fourth Estate. But if it’s a bombshell, it will be announced on a weekday,” Leibowitz predicted.
The Commerce Secretary’s recommendations could range from specific tariffs or quotas on any or all steel products to no new actions at all considering the effectiveness of existing antidumping and countervailing duty cases. “Alternatives to new tariffs or quotas under Section 232 include new safeguard cases on steel or self-initiated AD/CVD cases,” Leibowitz said.
At least one Steel Market Update source speculates that Commerce will indeed find that imports are a threat to national security, but the report will not recommend specific remedies because of resistance from the Department of Defense, which has expressed concern that the possible scope of the countries and the products covered is too broad and could impact relations with the nation’s allies. New Section 232 tariffs, broadly applied, would raise the cost of many manufactured goods and ultimately consumer prices.
Section 232 is far from the only trade issue in the works. Leibowitz expects other announcements from the White House before President Trump’s State of the Union address Jan. 30. They may include Section 301 measures against China for intellectual property violations, and reports on steel for pipelines and Buy America enforcement. Shortly after the State of the Union, a final determination is likely on Vietnam circumvention of U.S. corrosion-resistant and cold rolled steel duties. The president is also due to announce relief measures on two important safeguard cases—solar panels (Suniva) and large washing machines (Whirlpool)—which could potentially set precedents for other products. “Look for more Section 201 cases that allow the president to grant temporary import relief if these two cases result in import restrictions, Leibowitz said.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
China Has Failed to Comply With WTO Commitments: AISI
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) has laid out a case for China’s failure to comply with its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations, which it joined in 2001.
Deputy USTR Hits Out at ‘Surge’ of Mexican Steel Imports
Deputy United States Trade Representative (USTR) Jayme White met on Wednesday with Mexico’s Under Secretary of Economy for Foreign Trade Alejandro Encinas, and discussed issues regarding the “surge” into the US of Mexican steel and aluminum imports.
Leibowitz: Europe Aims to Impose Countervailing Duties on EVs From China
Trade policy moves create great ironies sometimes. I often write about these ironies when the US acts against the interests of the country as a whole by protecting certain industries from international competition. But the US is not alone, especially in recent years as the World Trade Organization and the international geopolitical order have been […]
Leibowitz: Banning Inputs and Components—Effective Policy or Not?
As the global trading system, which used to be “rules-based,” continues its slide toward the absence (defiance? disregard?) of rules, governments around the world are trying new things.
Leibowitz: Warming Commercial Relations? The Raimondo Visit to China
Last week the Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimondo, visited China for high-level meetings with the Chinese government. Her counterpart, Wang Wentao, China’s Commerce Minister, participated in the discussions. The four-day meeting included an announcement of two new working groups dealing with US-China economic relationships. The first was a forum to explain US export controls relating […]