SMU Data and Models

SMU Survey: Has the Market Already Factored in Section 232?
Written by Tim Triplett
February 6, 2018
As the steel industry continues to wait for President Trump’s decision on restricting steel imports on national security grounds, steel prices continue to rise. Has the market already factored in Section 232?
In Steel Market Update’s latest market trends questionnaire, SMU asked steel buyers: Do you believe existing steel prices include a positive Section 232 ruling on behalf of the steel industry (steel mills) expecting duties or quotas to stem the flow of foreign steel into the United States?
Nearly three out of four (72 percent) said yes, the market has already responded in anticipation of some form of Section 232 trade action. Following are some of their more insightful comments:
- “Steel prices are only due to current reduced import volumes for fear of 232 or circumvention.”
- “To be realistic, there is some effect, but it’s limited. The market is following a similar path to last year with a strong first quarter.”
- “Anticipation of 232 is supporting higher prices, but is not a major reason. General demand is very good.”
- “If further tariffs are announced, have no doubt the mills will still attempt to raise prices further based on that emotion. And if 232 is a bust, they will try to say it wasn’t a factor. However, emotional buyers will be afraid that everything is going to collapse and refuse to purchase without price concessions.”
- “The only game changer would be OCTG getting hit hard, then HR will push to $800 levels.”
- “The industry does not expect a strong positive from Section 232 directly, but it is expected due to the secondary effect of limiting imported tubing and pipe. This is driving up mill HR demand and is evident in the lead times stretching.”
- “Trump can’t risk adding more inflationary pressure to the economy. His actions on solar panels and washing machines were taken because his administration had to show the base they were doing something. They took these limited actions because they know they cannot risk the broader impact that steel tariffs would have. Nevertheless, the threat of 232 is keeping prices elevated.”

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in SMU Data and Models

Survey says: Market hit with another blast of tariff whiplash
If you’re feeling a sudden jerk and a case of tariff whiplash coming on, you’re not alone.

SMU flat-rolled market survey results now available
SMU’s latest steel buyers market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members. After logging in at steelmarketupdate.com, visit the pricing and analysis tab and look under the “survey results” section for “latest survey results.” Past survey results are also available under that selection. If you need help accessing the survey results, or if […]

SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment sinks to near pandemic levels
SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices moved in opposing directions this week. Our Current Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Index sharply fell to one of the lowest levels recorded in five years, while Future Buyers’ Sentiment marginally improved.

SMU Survey: Mill lead times tick higher after late-May lows
All five of the averages for sheet and plate mill lead times tracked by SMU extended moderately this week, according to buyers responding to our latest market survey.

SMU Survey: Mills less negotiable on sheet prices, buyers say
Most steel buyers responding to our market survey this week reported that domestic mills are considerably less willing to talk price on sheet products than they were in recent weeks, but remain open to bargain on plate prices.