Ironically, the Department of Defense is among the least enthusiastic about the Section 232 investigations into the impact of steel and aluminum imports on national security. After reviewing a draft of the Section 232 report last year, the DoD determined that trade restrictions proposed by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross would “unnecessarily vex U.S. allies.”
The Pentagon reiterated that stance in a memo to Commerce released this week. “DoD continues to be concerned about the negative impact on our key allies regarding the recommended options with the (Section 232) reports,” the Department wrote.
Although, the Pentagon “believes that the systematic use of unfair trade practices to intentionally erode our innovation and manufacturing industrial base poses a risk to our national security,” the memo notes that supporting U.S. military requirements requires only 3 percent of U.S. aluminum and steel production.
“Therefore, DoD does not believe that the findings in the reports impact the ability of DoD programs to acquire the steel or aluminum necessary to meet national defense requirements.”
The Department adds, “However, DoD recognizes that among these reports’ alternatives, targeted tariffs are more preferable than a global quota or tariff.”
The DoD suggests that an interagency group refine the targeted tariffs “so as to create incentives for trade partners to work with the U.S. on addressing the underlying issue of Chinese transshipment.”
If tariffs or quotas are imposed, they should be conditional, said DoD. If action is taken on steel imports, action on aluminum imports should be delayed. “The prospect of trade action on aluminum may be sufficient to coerce improved behavior of bad actors.”
The memo concludes: “This is an opportunity to set clear expectations domestically regarding competitiveness and rebuild economic strength at home while preserving a fair and reciprocal international economic system as outlined in the National Security Strategy. It is critical that we reinforce to our key allies that these actions are focused on correcting Chinese overproduction and countering their attempts to circumvent existing antidumping tariffs – not the bilateral U.S. relationship.”
Sandy WilliamsRead more from Sandy Williams
Latest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: A deep dive into the ITC determinations on tin mill product duties
The failure of the trade remedy actions against imported steel tin mill products (TMPs) continues to resonate. Cleveland-Cliffs and the United Steel Workers Union (USW) lost the case at the International Trade Commission (ITC) last month. A few days ago, the ITC released its final report explaining the decision against imposing antidumping and countervailing duties […]
AISI tells Congress to tighten trade legislation
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) is urging Congress to strengthen US trade laws. Specifically, Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of AISI, asked Congress to incorporate the provisions of the Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act in any trade legislation that moves forward this year.
Mexico eyes steel tariffs on US as trade fight brews
Mexico has said it will place retaliatory steel tariffs on the United States if the US acts to reimpose Section 232 on its neighbor, according to an article in Reuters.
Leibowitz: The future of WTO dispute settlement in the MC 13 conference
This week, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial conference convenes in Abu Dhabi, UAE. There are many issues on the WTO’s plate. The question is whether any resolution of these matters is likely or even possible. One of the most important issues is the future of the dispute settlement system, which has been rendered impotent […]
Leibowitz: Could change at the ITC keep Weirton tin mill open?
The International Trade Commission (ITC) voted earlier this month against imposing antidumping and countervailing duties on imports of tin mill products from four countries. When Cliffs filed trade cases on tin mill products in early 2023, the company claimed that the failure to get massive duties on imports would result in the closure of its mill in Weirton, W.Va. We don’t know the reasoning behind this decision, only that all four sitting Commissioners voted not to impose duties. We do know that Cliffs plans to close Weirton.