Trade Cases
How to Request a Section 232 Exclusion
Written by Tim Triplett
March 18, 2018
Details on how to request an exclusion from the Trump administration tariffs on steel and aluminum will be published in the Federal Register tomorrow. We received a copy of the exclusion procedure and some comments from trade attorney Lewis E. Leibowitz.
President Trump, using his authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, has determined that unfair imports of steel and aluminum pose a threat to the domestic industries, and thus to national security. On March 8, he announced tariffs of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum imports from all nations except Canada and Mexico. The tariffs are to take effect on March 23.
Steel and aluminum users in the United States may apply to the Commerce Department for exemptions on imported metal products that are not produced in the United States in a sufficient amount or of a satisfactory quality to meet their needs.
According to the interim final rule set for the Federal Register, “only individuals or organizations using steel in business activities (e.g., construction, manufacturing, or supplying steel product to users) in the United States may submit exclusion requests.” Left unclear is if or how individual countries may request exemptions.
“Under the interim rule, exclusions will apply to the requesting entity unless the Commerce Department decides to exclude broadly based on policy reasons. This is an unusual procedure in trade and tariff matters. Each interested company must request an exclusion, even if its competitors (customers?) have already received an exclusion,” said Leibowitz.
All exclusion requests must be in electronic form and submitted to the federal rulemaking portal (www.regulations.gov). Each request should clearly identify and support the basis on which the exclusion is sought. There is no time limit for submitting exclusion requests. The review period normally will not exceed 90 days, including adjudication of objections submitted on exclusion requests. Exclusions approved will generally be for a term of one year.
The Commerce Department anticipates about 4,500 exclusion requests on steel products.
Steel Market Update will have more details about how to go about filing for an exclusion in our Tuesday issue.
A side note, Lewis Leibowitz will be kicking off this year’s SMU Steel Summit Conference on Aug. 27 around 1:30 p.m. ET. He will be available to answer questions you may have about AD/CVD, circumvention, Section 337 and Section 232. You can find more information about our conference and how to register at: www.SteelMarketUpdate.com/events/steel-summit.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.
US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.