Trade Cases

Brazil Takes Quota on Steel But Tariff on Aluminum
Written by Sandy Williams
May 3, 2018
Brazil says it will agree to quotas on finished and semi-finished steel exports to the U.S. in return for exemption from the 25 percent Section 232 tariffs, according to Inside U.S. Trade. Brazil is the latest country to capitulate to U.S. demands, agreeing to a quota of 70 percent of its three-year average exports of finished steel and 100 percent of exports of semi-finished steel.
“Faced with the decision announced by the U.S., the representatives of the aluminum sector indicated that the less harmful alternative to their interests was to endure the additional tariffs of 10% that were originally foreseen,” the Brazilian Ministry of Industry and Commerce and the Foreign Relations Ministry said in a May 1 press release. “On the other hand, the representatives of the steel sector informed that the imposition of quotas would be less restrictive than the 25% tariff.”
Negotiations were cut short last week by the U.S. after telling Brazil’s foreign and trade ministers that the tariffs would be applied immediately unless the country accepted “restrictive unilateral quotas.”
“They said the decision was made on the eve of a presidential meeting, that the political conditions had changed, and there were no longer the conditions to keep negotiating as we had been,” said Brazil Institute President Marco Polo De Melo Lopes to journalists in a conference call on Wednesday. “Take it or leave it isn’t the way you treat a partner.”
The quotas will reduce Brazilian steel exports to the U.S. by 14.5 percent compared to 2017 levels, according to Inside US Trade and Commerce data.
“Brazilian products do not pose a threat to U.S. national security,” said a joint press release issued by Brazil’s Ministry of Industry and Commerce and the Foreign Relations Ministry. “On the contrary, the industries of both countries are integrated and complement each other.”
“The Brazilian government regrets that the negotiating process has been interrupted and reiterates that it remains open to building reasonable solutions for both parties. Furthermore, it reiterates its conviction that any restrictive measures would not be necessary and would not be justified under any circumstances,” said the release.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.