Trade Cases
No Product Exclusions for Quota Countries
Written by Sandy Williams
June 7, 2018
A new wrinkle has been revealed for those manufacturers seeking exclusions for steel and aluminum products from Brazil, South Korea and Argentina.
The three countries, which have agreed to quotas in lieu of tariffs, are not eligible for any product exemptions. A spokesperson for the Commerce Department confirmed the restriction in an email to Inside U.S. Trade:
“The Presidential Proclamations do not provide authority to grant product exclusions for quota countries. The President retains authority to adjust quotas as needed.”
If a company requires a certain product from a quota-designated country for its manufacturing process and that product has already reached its export limit, it could stall production.
Quotas have already been filled in 40 of the 54 subcategories for steel imports from Argentina and in 18 of the 54 subcategories for Brazil.
Although many analysts agree that allowing exemptions would defeat the quota’s intent, one former USTR official told Inside U.S. Trade that quotas are worse than tariffs for sellers.
“They are more restrictive than the tariffs because they are finite,” the source said. “They are very distorting because the first person to get to the customs window gets in. So, if your friend that exports the same thing gets in behind you, they are out of luck. This results in hoarding behavior, meaning a flood of exporters bringing in products and putting it in warehouses.”
Australia is also exempt from the tariffs, but terms of the deal between Washington and Australian officials are not yet public.
So far, Commerce has not approved or disapproved any of the more than 11,000 steel product exclusion requests it has received.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America