Trade Cases

Steel Lobbying Groups, USW Urge Biden to Keep Section 232
Written by Michael Cowden
May 19, 2021
A coalition of U.S. steel industry lobbying groups and the United Steelworkers (USW) union want the Biden administration to keep Trump-era Section 232 tariffs and quotas on imported steel in place.
The groups say the tariffs – rolled out in March 2018 on national security grounds – are necessary for the survival of the domestic steel industry.
“Eliminating the steel tariffs now would undermine the viability of our industry,” they said in a letter addressed to the White House and dated Wednesday, May 19. “Global steel overcapacity has only increased during the pandemic, and past economic crises have led to devastating import surges as other nations dumped their excess steel into the U.S. market.”
The letter urging President Biden to keep Section 232 in place comes after U.S. and European trade officials announced a trade truce earlier this week that could result in the eventual easing or lifting of tariffs against steel and aluminum from the EU – a traditional U.S. ally.
The letter was signed by Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI); Thomas Conway, international president of the USW; and Philip Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA). Other signatories were Roger Schagrin, executive director and general counsel for the Committee on Pipe and Tube Imports (CPTI); Laurence Lasoff, counsel for the Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA); Charles Carter, president of the American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC); and Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM).
The groups noted that U.S steel output is up approximately 50% year-over-year.
U.S. mills produced approximately 1.8 million tons of raw steel in the week ended May 15, up 47.5% from about 1.2 million tons in the same week last year, according to AISI data.
Production was slashed in the second quarter of 2020 following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The groups also pushed backed against the idea that Section 232 should be scrapped to fend off high prices and long lead times for steel. They noted that a host of goods worldwide – everything from lumber and concrete to semiconductors and cleaning products – have experienced similar issues as supply chains were stretched by unexpected demand shifts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Virtually every steel market around the world is experiencing record high prices and long local lead times,” the groups said.
And the tariffs have allowed U.S. steel producers to spend $15.7 billion to build new plants or upgrades to existing ones. “The tariffs have been a success, allowing our industry to restart idled mills, rehire laid-off workers and invest in the future,” they said, noting that “a significant amount of new steelmaking capacity” has entered production “very recently.”
The groups did not mention any company by name. But Big River Steel, now part of U.S. Steel, recently doubled capacity at its steel mill in Osceola, Ark. Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI) expects to complete a new flat-rolled steel mill in Sinton, Texas, in late summer. And both Nucor and North Star BlueScope are underway with significant expansions to existing U.S. facilities.
And the tariffs should remain in place not only for the national security reasons cited by the Trump administration when it imposed the measure in 2018 but also as the Biden administration aims to pass an ambitious infrastructure package and as the world, including the U.S., aims to reduce carbon emissions, the groups said.
“A fact, that often goes unrecognized, is the tariffs have dramatically reduced the amount of high CO2-emitting foreign steel that comes to our shores,” SMA’s Bell told SMU.
“The administration has a choice. It can regress to the failed policies of the past that lead to subsidies and global excess steel capacity by China and other countries around the globe, or it can leave the tariffs in place while it collaborates with industry,” he said.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: The UK trade agreement, a template for future trade deals?
The UK deal may signal relaxation of the heaviest tariffs. The suspension of the reciprocal tariffs greater than 10% - remember, 57 countries were hit with that - ends on July 9. But it could be extended. If more deals like the one with the UK are struck, the suspensions may continue to permit more agreements - relieving global markets of considerable worry.

US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.

US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.

Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.

Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.