Features
Ferrous Scrap: The Iron Foundry Market
Written by Stephen Miller
November 10, 2023
The iron and steel foundry industries consume about 17% of the ferrous scrap in the US each year. They purchase several grades of scrap in common with steelmakers, such as shredded and turnings. But, most of the grades are much more restrictive than what larger mills require.
Today, the majority of steel mills use the electric-arc furnace (EAF) to manufacture steel. However, most foundries use an electric induction furnace (EIF) to melt scrap and convert it into iron or refine into steel. These EIFs are smaller and can only process certain grades and sizes of scrap. The same goes for the cupola furnaces still operating.
So, one main difference is scrap size. The vast majority of foundries insist on all scrap they purchase be under 24” in length, some even demand 18” max. This is true for busheling, punchings, plate and structurals (P&S), and cast-iron scrap. Most mills, on the other hand, have a specification on length of 60” and under. So, these grades are two different animals.
Since it is more costly to prepare or segregate material to comply with the tighter foundry specifications, the sales price is vastly increased over what steel mills buy.
Another difference is chemistry. Because of their larger melt size, steel mills can afford a much looser specification for the chemical profile of the scrap they buy. Not that this is very liberal by any means. But it is far less rigid than what most foundries ask for. Steel mills make steel, but most foundries make iron castings, which are used for parts for cars, trains, and planes. They have to be perfect. For instance, on Manganese (Mn) content, most mills have a specification of 1.65% and under. For foundries making gray iron casting, their busheling spec for Mn is usually 0.60-0.90%, whereas ductile foundries are usually 0.40% max. This limits the universe from where a supplier can source scrap. To get steel scrap with 0.4% max Mn, you can’t use 80% of SAE 1000 Series steels.
A third difference is coatings. Over the last several decades, steelmakers have had to accept scrap with coatings such as galvanized and zincrometal. They had to install expensive anti-pollution equipment to be able to melt these grades, as protective coatings became required by the automobile industry. Not so with foundries. They require zero coatings for the industrial busheling they melt. They just could never afford the anti-pollution equipment. So, they insist on uncoated, “black” scrap without excessive oil or painted stock. Needless to say, this type of material is hard to come by and is much more expensive.
To give some of you scrap generators the price differences between mill scrap and foundry scrap, let’s take a few examples.
For November, on an FOB truck delivered Toledo, Ohio, basis here are the prices of mill grades vs. foundry grades, in gross tons:
#1 Busheling | Mill grade (60”L) | $425 |
Low Mn Foundry grade (24”L) | $505 | |
Plate & Structural | Mill Grade (60”L) | $385 |
Foundry grade (24”L) | $435 | |
Auto Cast Iron | Mills usually don’t buy separately | |
It’s mixed in with shredded | $395 | |
Foundry grade | $465-480 |
As you can see, the premiums are $50-85 per gross ton (GT).
According to Mark Fritts of Fortify Trading, the projections are this gap will widen in the not-too-distant future. The labor involved in processing scrap continues to rise. Also, it’s harder and harder to obtain low Mn busheling with the alloys now in low weight, high-strength steels being used by the automotive industry. Fritts added, “These quality grades of scrap are on a continual decline.”
Another source had prices of this grade as high as $520 per GT. He mentioned the United Auto Workers (UAW) strike had not hurt his overall supply.
Stephen Miller
Read more from Stephen MillerLatest in Features
Final thoughts
Sometimes even in a bit of chaos there is complacency. And it seems that since March 2020, “a bit of chaos” has been the order of the day. That means in the world at large, and in steel specifically.
Leibowitz: The impact of new, harsher tariffs on China
The free market operates best when it is freest. But all governments intervene in markets in response to conditions that threaten peaceful progress. President Biden decided last week that market intervention was justified. He approved a report from the US Trade Representative (USTR) that recommended continuing the “Section 301” tariffs on Chinese imports into the United States.
AISI: USMCA can handle US, Mexico trade dust-up
The USMCA should be strong enough to handle trade disagreements on steel between the US and Mexico, according to the American Iron and Steel Institute’s (AISI’s) Kevin Dempsey.
Steel cylinders from India face US import duties
Non-refillable steel cylinder imports from India are subject to new antidumping and countervailing duties (AD/CVD).
Final thoughts
SMU had the pleasure of attending the American Iron and Steel Institute's (AISI's) annual general meeting in Washington this week. It was a slow week in our nation's capital, so we were able to take a leisurely stroll around the National Mall and take in the sights. Just kidding. In fact, the meeting coincided with significant trade actions announced by the Biden administration. It included, among other things, additional tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum.