Environment and Energy
Carbon border tax proposed in revival of Clean Competition Act
Written by Becca Moczygemba
December 7, 2023
On Dec. 6, US Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) reintroduced the Clean Competition Act, an environmental trade directive that would impose charges on imports from more carbon-intensive manufacturers.
“There is bipartisan momentum for a carbon border adjustment in the Senate – this is a solution endorsed by industry and experts across the political spectrum,” Whitehouse said in an online statement.
The legislation, originally proposed on June 8, 2022, is meant to enable more American companies to better compete against other countries.
According to the senator’s website, “The Clean Competition Act would impose a carbon border adjustment on energy-intensive imports while incentivizing decarbonization of domestic manufacturing.”
The adjustment would apply to energy-intensive industries such as iron and steel, aluminum, hydrogen, fossil fuels, and fertilizer. Plans for a few years down the road would expand the act to include imported finished goods that meet certain weight or value thresholds.
The full text of the Clean Competition Act is here.
The discussion of carbon tariffs is an ongoing conversation. Recall the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) and the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) are also participating in initiatives concerning carbon emissions.
AISI’s reaction
“As the American steel industry leads the world in low-carbon steel production, a carbon tariff approach will help level the playing field for American steel producers,” said AISI President and CEO Kevin Dempsey in an email to SMU.
He added that the bill would ensure that domestic industry investments in cleaner production processes are not undercut by high-carbon-emitting steel made overseas.
“AISI strongly opposes the Clean Competition Act’s proposed tax on domestic carbon emissions, however,” Dempsey noted. He said the provision would penalize domestic producers who are making great strides towards decarbonization. Additionally, it would deprive US steel producers of the capital necessary to proceed with investments for domestic decarbonization and innovation.
SMA’s reaction
“By creating a low carbon checkpoint for the American marketplace that requires foreign steel producers to meet the low carbon intensity levels of our domestic producers, the bill will incentivize global production away from the high carbon production of traditional extractive steelmaking,” said the SMA in an email to SMU.
The SMA is pleased to see the introduction of the bill. However, it is firmly opposed to the imposition of new taxes on domestic steel production.
Becca Moczygemba
Read more from Becca MoczygembaLatest in Environment and Energy
SunCoke Q1 earnings jump on cokemaking, logistics ops
SunCoke's earnings soared in the first quarter, with the company citing strong performances in its cokemaking and logistics segments.
GSCC: Steel decarbonizing for a more sustainable future
Steel is a foundation of the global economy. It is an essential raw material for nearly every industry, from automotive and construction to transportation, machinery, and energy.
DOE transformer rule to benefit Cliffs’ electrical steel
The US Department of Energy has finalized Congressionally mandated energy-efficiency standards for transformers.
SMA: US steelmakers deserve credit for leading decarbonization charge
When it comes to finding ways to reduce emissions in steel manufacturing, we are in the all-of-the-above camp.
AISI explains new PM2.5 air-quality regulation’s impact on steel
The US already had strict regulations on air-quality standards for particulate matter, but they are going to get even tighter.