• Skip to main content

    Government/Policy

    Op-Ed: Strong trade enforcement builds prosperity and security


    Tariffs on unfairly traded steel and other products help to stabilize America’s most important industries, safeguard tens of thousands of jobs, and protect national security.

    My union, the United Steelworkers (USW), never seeks these remedies lightly. And presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, implement them only after diligent investigations documenting the harm that foreign adversaries intentionally inflict upon our country with dumping, overproduction, and other kinds of trade cheating.

    I don’t think Lewis Leibowitz considered these points while criticizing tariffs in his excessively pro-free-trade column, “Where is the voice of the consumer?” on May 5.

    Fair trade—premised on mutual respect, evenly balanced scales, and a shared commitment to the rules—helps to strengthen international bonds and build prosperity for working people.

    But unfair trade, conducted for nefarious economic and political purposes, foments discord between nations while trying to pit workers against each other.

    David McCall, International President, USW

    As a union activist since the 1970s, I witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of unfair trade on workers, families, and communities. My earliest work with the union included establishing a food bank to support laid-off USW members and their families in Burns Harbor, Ind.

    Mr. Leibowitz portrays tariffs as a way of stacking the deck in our favor and stiff-arming the foreign companies seeking honest business in US markets.

    But nothing could be further from the truth.

    Tariffs—along with countervailing and anti-dumping duties—hold cheaters accountable and help to level the playing field for American workers.

    Trade enforcement sends a zero-tolerance message to foreign companies that undersell US competitors only because they receive improper subsidies from their own governments, use child or prison labor, subject workers to unsafe conditions, pollute the environment with impunity, or route products through third countries to evade trade rules.

    Tariffs safeguard industries crucial for American infrastructure and defense. They support robust supply chains and help to ensure that we will never again run short of critical goods as we did during the pandemic.

    For example, the Section 232 tariffs, continued by the Biden administration, are working in tandem with the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the CHIPS and Science Act to supercharge the nation’s economy in the wake of COVID-19.

    My union proudly fought for the Section 232 tariffs and then helped to push the infrastructure legislation and other job-creating bills through Congress.

    The truth is that strong trade enforcement reflects the voice of the US consumer, who plays by the rules and expects others to do the same. Trade enforcement also meets the needs of the American parent, who wants to be sure the food and manufactured products introduced into the home come from companies adhering to the strictest possible manufacturing standards.

    And trade enforcement represents the will of the voters and taxpayers who want to build America’s economy, not China’s or any other country’s.

    At the request of a USW-led coalition, the Biden administration recently agreed to open an investigation into China’s illegal efforts to capture the global shipbuilding market and dominate global logistics networks.

    China’s scheme to hijack the commercial shipbuilding industry has cost the US dozens of shipyards and tens of thousands of jobs since the 1980s. It’s also left the country dangerously dependent on ships that China builds, owns, and operates. China can cut off access to these ships at any time, for any reason, potentially choking off both the transportation of US goods and the sealift capacity our military needs in times of crisis.

    Now, my union and our allies intend to revitalize American shipbuilding and grow jobs in the numerous industries making up shipbuilding supply chains. That’s simply common-sense economic and security policy—and ensures that America remains a bastion of strength and independence.

    Union workers and American manufacturers are not only vigilant but innovative and resilient.

    My union fights for tens of millions in capital investments to keep plants viable, and our members take the lead in pioneering new technology in cutting-edge industries, such as electric batteries and vehicles. We’re the most efficient workers in the world, and we’ll outcompete anyone in a fair fight.

    When Mr. Leibowitz argues that trade promotes world peace, he is only half right.

    Fair trade—premised on mutual respect, evenly balanced scales, and a shared commitment to the rules—helps to strengthen international bonds and build prosperity for working people.

    But unfair trade, conducted for nefarious economic and political purposes, foments discord between nations while trying to pit workers against each other.

    My union has long stood up to cheaters and other bad actors. And we always will.

    Editor’s note

    SMU welcomes opinions from across the steel industry. We’re very happy to welcome the thoughts above from USW International President David McCall. We also appreciated the opinions shared by Nippon Steel earlier this year. If you have an opinion you’d like to express to the broader steel community, please contact us at info@steelmarketupdate.com.

    Latest in Government/Policy

    Price on trade: Steel industry trick-or-treat

    It’s the scariest time of year in Washington, D.C. … election season. The city is a veritable haunted house of prognostication and speculation as everyone tries to discern which way the howling wind will blow. We’ll let the fortune tellers and prediction markets guess the outcomes of the midterms. What we do know is this: the steel industry has experienced its share of tricks and treats over the past few months. Below are a few notable steel tricks and treats this Halloween season.

    Leibowitz: The dilemmas facing primary aluminum and BOF steel

    Earlier this month, retired General David Petraeus, whose resume is as impressive as any I’ve seen, held a fireside chat at the National Press Club with Century Aluminum CEO Jesse Gary and Mark Duffy, the president and CEO of the American Primary Aluminum Association. During that widely reported chat, retired Gen. Petraeus stated that the US was not militarily ready for a conflict. Because the event concentrated on aluminum, and primary aluminum at that, his remarks hit harder than I think the full facts warrant.

    Canada, Ontario commit billions to steel and automotive industries

    The Canadian federal government and the Ontario provincial government have announced five-year commitments totaling CA$5.22 billion (US$3.72 billion) for a Joint Steel Action Fund. That funding comes alongside up to an additional CA$2.5 billion over two years for large-scale automotive capital projects. The federal and provincial governments said the package is intended to support domestic steel production, automotive manufacturing, and the transition to connected and electric vehicles.

    Commerce lowers Mexico’s dumping rate in CORE case

    The US Department of Commerce has reduced the anti-dumping duty on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) for some Mexican producers after a court order. On remand from the Court of International Trade (CIT), Commerce agreed that the record did not show that Galvasid SA de CV’s US customers separately negotiated or paid freight or insurance. The agency therefore removed the adjustment and recalculated the margin. As a result, the agency lowered Galvasid’s coated steel dumping rate to 14.54%, from 24.05%. The all-others rate is now 14.29%, down from 17.42%. Ternium’s rate is unchanged at 14.17%.

    Price on Trade: Steel’s zero-sum game

    During the first three quarters of 2026, finished steel imports from South Korea increased 50.8% compared with the same period in 2025. Imports from Vietnam increased 23.4%, imports from Turkey increased 49.5%, and imports from India increased 29.5%. Those are not marginal increases. They are substantial import surges, especially in a US market where apparent domestic consumption has bounced around but has not grown since 2017. More importantly, these import surges are arriving at lower average unit values (AUVs).