Features

CRU: Countries start protecting steel in world of 25% US tariffs
Written by CRU
March 21, 2025
India’s trade investigation body has recommended imposing a 12% provisional safeguard duty on steel products for 200 days; South Korea has pledged to act to prevent the circumvention of anti-dumping (AD) duties on imported steel; and Britain’s steel majors say they are losing customers in the US.
These developments come at a time when the global trading system has been shaken up by US President Donald Trump’s greater use of tariffs, including employing Section 232 legislation to impose a 25% levy on steel from all countries to protect national security.
India
However, India’s Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) investigation into a surge in imports of non-alloy and alloy flat steel products dates back to last December following a complaint from the Indian Steel Association, which is concerned about the rise of deliveries from countries such as China, the Press Trust of India news agency reported.
The Directorate has preliminarily found the imports are causing, or threatening to cause, serious injury to the domestic industry. Delaying provisional safeguard measures would cause damage that would be difficult to repair, the DGTR argues. The finance ministry has the final say on the matter.
South Korea
Meanwhile, the South Korean government announced it would act to prevent the circumvention of AD tariffs on steel products to help protect the domestic industry amid greater global trade barriers.
Measures include revising customs regulations to allow the Korea Trade Commission (KTC) to investigate circumvention; the requirement of a mill test certificate with detailed information on a steel product’s country of origin; and the formation of a special team within the customs service to crack down on the practice of disguising imported goods as domestically produced.
At the same time, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy will work to exempt duties on South Korean steel products by closely communicating with governments of major economies, including the US, Yonhap news agency reported.
In addition, the Ministry plans to devise a strategy later this year to bolster the domestic steel industry’s competitiveness to overcome the crisis sparked by the global trade war.
United Kingdom
Commenting on the 25% US tariffs, Tata Steel’s UK Chief Executive Rajesh Nair told members of Britain’s parliament: “Customers are spooked and the customers are wanting to go to other suppliers to make sure that they don’t get caught in the tariff warfare. So customers are already talking to us and wanting to cancel orders and, in some cases, are asking us for compensation for potential orders.” The damage to sales and profits could be significant, he added.
The country’s steel producers are also concerned that a flood of cheap steel could enter the UK as foreign sellers seek buyers to replace previous US orders, local media reported.
Allan Bell, chief commercial officer at longs producer British Steel, called for short-term measures “to protect what we have in the country” rather than retaliatory measures against the US.
While the European Commission is acting to block diverted steel from its market, the British government appears to be slower in acting, according to the executives. An apparent mismatch in policies meant that EU steel prices were £60 per metric ton ($77.80/mt, €71.40/mt) higher than the UK’s, Nair said.
As for the impact on the ~50,000 metric tons a year of products British Steel sells into the United States, Bell told the House of Commons Business and Trade Committee: “[Customers] are considering order cancellations. On some products, they are going to other [US] producers. Where there are other domestic producers, we have exited that business immediately. Other customers are worried about the impact of tariffs. Some customers where we are the sole supplier have said they will make moves to purchase that steel elsewhere.”
Also, US producers are developing tooling capabilities to replace British Steel-made products. “So it will not hurt us immediately, but there will be damage in circa nine months’ time,” said Bell.
This article was first published by CRU. To learn about CRU’s global commodities research and analysis services, visit www.crugroup.com.

Latest in Features

Commerce launches probe into unfairly traded rebar imports
Here are the details and a case timeline for the rebar trade case recently initiated by the Commerce Department.

Final Thoughts
Based on the amount of ‘out of office’ replies we’ve been receiving and the results of this week’s steel buyers’ survey, those pesky summer doldrums have arrived for the steel industry.

SMU Community Chat: CRU analysts Thais Terzian and Frank Nikolic on Wednesday
CRU analysts Thais Terzian and Frank Nikolic will be the featured guests on the next SMU Community Chat on Wednesday, July 9, at 11 am ET. The live webinar is free for anyone to attend. A recording will be available to SMU subscribers.

Leibowitz on Trade: Who is winning the tariff debate?
Most economists will tell you that universal tariffs will result in inflation and reduce demand, causing a recession or worse. (After all, this is what happened in the 1930s). It is a rare product that is so essential that demand will not go down if prices go up.

SMU’s Week in Review: June 23-27
A roundup of trade news, what's up with Brazilian pig iron, SMU's latest survey results and more to keep you up to date.