Economy
May 2014 – The Month That Was…
Written by John Packard
June 1, 2014
As usual we will spend a few moments taking a look at the month of May in our rear view mirror to see what transpired.
SMU Price Momentum Indicator was adjusted during the month from Higher to Neutral as we detected a change in the supply/demand dynamics with the return to full production at US Steel Gary Works and US Steel Great Lakes. We also learned that AK Steel had apparently caught up its hot rolled and cold rolled order book (still extended on coated) which in the past has put them into the spot market. The other big issue is foreign steel imports which the US Department of Commerce (US DOC) has pegged April Preliminary Census data at 3.7 million net tons up from 3.2 million tons in January, February and March. Even more disturbing is our forecast based on US DOC license data that May steel imports could well exceed the 3.7 million net tons and could end up as high as 4.0 million net tons.
SMU Buyers Sentiment Index set two record highs during the month of May (+59 and then +62) meaning flat rolled steel buyers and sellers are quite optimistic about their company’s ability to be successful in the current economic environment.
Benchmark hot rolled prices averaged $680 per ton according to our SMU price index. The CRU average was $685 while Platts came in at $689 for the month. We will let you decide which was more accurate. The CRU number is used to settle HRC Futures contracts on the CME.
An item to watch when reviewing the economic data is the AIA Billings Index which has slipped below 50.0 for the second month in a row. A number below 50.0 indicates a shrinking construction market. Not shown in the numbers in the table below is new home sales/building permits which are at disappointing levels now seven years after the beginning of the housing recession which began in 2007.
Apparent steel supply rose dramatically in March to 9.754 million net tons. February was impacted by severe weather across the country and it came in at 9.003 million net tons.
Below is our end of the month table for the month of May 2014:
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Economy
CRU: Dollar and bond yields rise, metal prices fall as Trump wins election
Donald Trump has won the US presidential election. The Republican party has re-taken control of the Senate. Votes are still being counted in many tight congressional races. But based on results so far, the Republicans seem likely to maintain control of the House of Representatives. If confirmed, this will give Trump considerable scope to pass legislation pursuing his agenda. What this means for US policy is not immediately obvious. Trump will not be inaugurated until Jan. 20. In the coming weeks and months, he will begin to assemble his cabinet, which may give a clearer signal on his policy priorities and approaches. Based on statements he made during the presidential campaign, we have set out the likely direction of his economic policy here and green policy here.
ISM: Manufacturing index fell in Oct to lowest point of ’24
Domestic manufacturing contracted for the seventh straight month in October, according to the latest report from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM). This marks the 23rd time in the last 24 months that it has been in contraction.
Chicago Business Barometer slips in October
The Chicago Business Barometer fell to a five-month low in October and continues to indicate deteriorating business conditions, according to Market News International (MNI) and the Institute for Supply Management (ISM).
Final Thoughts
We all know the American news cycle moves pretty fast. Viral today, cached tomorrow. So it is with the US presidential election on Tuesday, Nov. 5. People have election fatigue. They've moved on to other things like planning holiday parties, debating Super Bowl hopefuls, or even starting to look forward to our Tampa Steel Conference in February.
CRU: What will the US elections mean for economic policy?
In this Insight piece, CRU economists explore the possible economic effects of Trump's and Harris' agendas.