Trade Cases
Tariff on Tinplate a Real Kick in the Can
Written by Sandy Williams
May 15, 2018
Tinplate steel manufacturers received the backing of a bipartisan group of House members who urged the administration to exclude steel used for can manufacturing from Section 232 tariffs.
In a letter dated May 10, Congress members implored Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross not to impose 25 percent tariffs on steel used exclusively for can manufacturing, citing insufficient domestic production and injury to the can manufacturing industry.
“An exclusion for tinplate will not undermine the goals of the Section 232 measures – in fact, if tinplate is not excluded, the loss in demand resulting from the 25 percent tariff will also reduce demand for U.S.-made tinplate, injuring that segment of the domestic steel industry,” said the lawmakers in a May 10 letter to Ross.
In comments on March 2, Ross scoffed at any perceived injury from tariffs on steel cans. A soup can contains just 2.6 cents worth of steel, which would mean less than one cent would be added to the cost per can. “Who in the world is going to be too bothered by six tenths of a cent?” Ross said.
Ross’ figures are misleading, however, according to the canning industry, which said the cost of a 15-ounce can is closer to 17 cents, thereby adding an additional 4 cents per can if tariffs are applied. In the letter to Ross, lawmakers estimated that a 25 percent tariff will increase the cost of tinplate for U.S. steel can producers by more than $600 million per year.
Lawmakers wrote that U.S. demand for tinplate steel was 2.1 million tons in 2016, while domestic production was only 1.2 million tons.
“This means only 58 percent of domestic demand can be met by U.S. tinplate producers, thus leaving no choice but for U.S. can manufacturers to turn to foreign tinplate steel suppliers,” the letter states. “Exclusion for tinplate steel imports is necessary to ensure that U.S. can manufacturers have an adequate supply of quality tinplate to support their production operations and thereby protect U.S. jobs.”
The letter also noted that the rejection rate for domestically produced tinplate is approximately 300-500 percent higher than foreign-produced tinplate and has a reputation of late delivery times.
“With tariffs on tinplate steel, plastic substitutes would become more competitive and metal can manufacturers would suffer a permanent loss in demand for their products,” wrote the lawmakers.
Food producers are also weighing in on the steel tariffs. Daniel Vincent, president and CEO of Pacific Coast Producers, told Bloomberg News that “more than half” of his “projected 2018 profit was wiped out with a stroke of President Donald Trump’s pen.”
PCP expects to use approximately 700 million tin-coated steel cans this year for produce grown in California. Since the tariffs on steel were announced, PCP’s steel costs increased 9 percent due to higher steel pricing. Vincent projects his steel bill to jump nearly $20 million this year.
“Look, we all want to protect U.S. steelworkers,” said Vincent. “But we don’t want to be an unintended consequence of this.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Which countries get a ‘zonk’ in Trump’s primetime ‘Let’s Make a (Trade) Deal’ show?
As the president’s August 1 tariff deadline approaches, the “Let’s Make a Deal” game show returns to primetime (the Monty Hall version, of course). As the administration begins rolling out trade deals, we are starting to see what’s behind door number one and who is getting a “zonk.”
Trump says Canada deal might not happen: Report
President Trump said a negotiated deal with Canada might not occur, and all existing tariffs, along with those set to take effect soon, will stay in place, according to media reports.
Steel trade groups applaud Trump’s S232 tariffs
Five trade organizations involved with North American steel have praised President Trump’s Section 232 tariffs on steel for helping the domestic industry.
Leibowitz on Trade: Bringing manufacturing back to the US
Industries that use steel in manufacturing employ many more workers than steel production. Raising the cost of steel for these customers will not increase manufacturing employment. In fact, it will probably hit employment hard.
China hits out at Canadian tariff actions
The Chinese government has threatened countermeasures on Canada following the Canadian government's announcement on curbing steel imports, according to media reports.