Trade Cases
India Appeals Section 232 Tariffs to WTO
Written by Sandy Williams
May 24, 2018
India is disputing the legality of Section 232 tariffs and quota arrangements by the United States, claiming violations of the GATT and Safeguards Agreement.
India filed an official request with the World Trade Organization for dispute settlement consultations with the United States. India joins several other nations which dismiss the claim that imports of aluminum and steel are threatening U.S. national security. India, China, Russia, Japan, Turkey and the EU have labeled the tariffs safeguard measures under WTO rules, entitling them to a combined $3.5 billion in annual compensation. The nations have informed the WTO they may increase duties on U.S. goods in retaliation under WTO safeguard rules to balance the effects of the U.S tariffs.
India asserts that quota deals arranged by the U.S with Argentina, Brazil, South Korea and Australia are voluntary export restraints prohibited by WTO rules.
Article 11.1(b) of the Agreement on Safeguards and Article XI:1 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade states that “a Member shall not seek, take, or maintain any voluntary export restraints, orderly marketing arrangements or any other similar measures on the export or the import side.” GATT Article XI:1 states that WTO members may not maintain trade restrictions other than duties, taxes or other charges.
India also asserts that the U.S. is not applying tariffs and quotas uniformly to nations that export steel and aluminum to the U.S., thereby discriminating against products originating from India.
The WTO must respond to India’s May 18 consultation request within 10 days, and enter into consultations within 30 days. If after 60 days the U.S. and India have not resolved the issues, India can request the establishment of a dispute settlement panel.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.