Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: U.S. Pact with Mexico Leaves Many Questions Unanswered
Written by Tim Triplett
August 7, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest developments in Washington:
While attending and giving a presentation to the SMU Steel Summit conference in Atlanta on Monday, word came that the U.S. and Mexico had reached a tentative deal on a revised trade agreement. President Trump says it will replace NAFTA, but there is much to be done before that happens.
The U.S. Trade Representative’s Office issued a fact sheet yesterday that contains a summary of what the U.S. and Mexico have at least tentatively agreed to. The text of the new agreement had not been released as of this morning. There are six major sections to the fact sheet: (1) intellectual property protection; (2) digital trade; (3) de minimis value for Mexico raised to $100 (this is the value per entry into Mexico that will not require formal entry, an advantage for small businesses and e-commerce retailers); (4) financial services; (5) labor (including a requirement that 40-45 percent of labor used in automobile production be paid at a rate of at least $16 (U.S.) per hour; and (6) the environment. The fact sheet does not mention steel and aluminum tariffs under Section 232 or any reform of antidumping and countervailing duty measures, although the U.S. had been pushing for changes to the dispute settlement provisions of NAFTA (Chapter 19).
Reports surfaced yesterday that Mexico had agreed to steel and aluminum quotas to replace the Section 232 tariffs. These reports could not be confirmed. As I’ve reported before, the quota agreements governing steel imports from Brazil, South Korea and Argentina are in important ways worse than the tariffs. On the other hand, Australia has a special arrangement that appears to be less onerous than the other quota agreements. Mexico and Canada may be looking at Australia as a model—but there is not much to see. Both Australia and the U.S. have essentially been silent on the details of their arrangement.
Canada was not included in the bilateral discussions that led to yesterday’s announcement. The Canadian trade minister will arrive in D.C. today for talks. There are certain to be important issues (dairy, digital trade, and steel and aluminum tariffs) that will be discussed. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has said that the Mexico deal will be referred to Congress on Friday, triggering a 90-day period for finalizing the text. If Canada signs on, it will be a trilateral agreement; if not, it will be a bilateral agreement.
There are many questions remaining: If Canada does not sign on, will President Trump terminate NAFTA and impose tariffs on Canadian exports? Can the president legally terminate NAFTA (there is considerable controversy on this point)? Will the steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico be altered in important ways as part of the negotiation? No news on these points was forthcoming yesterday, other than the report mentioned earlier.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America
Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]