Trade Cases
AIIS: Other Nations in Line for Higher Tariffs?
Written by Tim Triplett
August 19, 2018
Turkey may not be the last nation to face escalating tariffs from the Trump administration, according to the American Institute for International Steel’s (AIIS) interpretation of the presidential proclamation.
President Trump doubled the Section 232 duties on steel products from Turkey from 25 percent to 50 percent, effective Aug. 13. The proclamation behind the action indicates that capacity utilization rates in the domestic steel industry have not increased to the level recommended in the Commerce Department Section 232 report. It further notes that import levels have declined, but not to the extent necessary to result in the desired increase in domestic capacity utilization.
Although the original proclamation provided for identical duty rates for all covered countries, it was considered necessary to adjust the tariff for Turkey as “a significant step toward ensuring the viability of the domestic steel industry.”
Turkey is just one of 12 countries listed in the Commerce Department report that could be considered for higher duties should the president determine not to impose the same duty rates on all countries. The 12 countries listed for possible higher duty rates are Brazil, China, Costa Rica, Egypt, India, Malaysia, Republic of Korea, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey and Vietnam. Two of these (Brazil and Korea) are covered by quota agreements. The remaining nine countries, therefore, seem to be possible future targets for duty increases, said attorney Steven W. Baker, AIIS Customs Committee Chairman.
Although not stated in the proclamation, one justification given for the duty increase for Turkey is that the significant decline in the value of the Turkish lira against the U.S. dollar resulted in Turkish steel avoiding some of the duty effects felt by steel from countries with stronger currencies. How this may be applied to other countries with currencies declining against the dollar is unclear. Political controversies with Turkey [such as its arrest of an American pastor on terrorism charges] have also been cited as possibly having an effect on the determination. This has led to concerns about the possible use of the Section 232 duties for other than the claimed national security purposes, Baker noted.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz on trade: Trump’s reciprocal tariffs face mounting legal challenges
The tariffs amount to a wholesale transformation of US trade policy from one promoting increasing international interaction to one of restricting trade to serve national strategic goals.
Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.
Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.
Price: Which countries get a ‘zonk’ in Trump’s primetime ‘Let’s Make a (Trade) Deal’ show?
As the president’s August 1 tariff deadline approaches, the “Let’s Make a Deal” game show returns to primetime (the Monty Hall version, of course). As the administration begins rolling out trade deals, we are starting to see what’s behind door number one and who is getting a “zonk.”
Trump says Canada deal might not happen: Report
President Trump said a negotiated deal with Canada might not occur, and all existing tariffs, along with those set to take effect soon, will stay in place, according to media reports.