Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Bill Would Limit Presidential Authority
Written by John Packard
February 3, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
Congress started the year in international trade by introducing bills to limit presidential authority to order import restrictions. There are two significant pieces of legislation in the House and one in the Senate. I will briefly summarize the House bill, H.R. 723, entitled Global Trade Accountability Act of 2019, which was introduced in the House on Jan. 23.
H.R. 723 would add a provision to trade legislation requiring that any “unilateral trade action” by the president be effective only after a congressional joint resolution approving the action. A “unilateral trade action” means any presidential decision under several statutes. The Trade Act of 1974 includes authority to act in response to balance of payment issues (section 122), to unfair acts in international trade (section 301 and following), market disruption (sections 406, 421 and 422), foreign discrimination against products of the United States (19 USC section 1338), national security actions (section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962), implementation of trade agreements (section 103(a) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015, the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency Economic Powers Act. This bill is clearly not limited to section 232 actions. While the president could take action for a non-renewable period of 90 days, for a period any longer unilateral action would have to approved by a congressional joint resolution in order to take effect. This would be effected by a new statute (section 155, amending the Trade Act of 1974) that prescribes procedures for consideration of such a joint resolution.
The bill was introduced Jan. 23 with 10 cosponsors, all Republicans. It has broad business community support, but it is not bipartisan, at least not yet.
This bill and the Bicameral Congressional Trade Authority Act of 2019, introduced in the House and Senate on Jan. 30, are the first efforts in the new Congress to restrict the president’s authority to impose tariffs, quotas and other trade restrictions that may harm essential industries in the United States without consulting Congress. It is too early to predict where this effort will lead. However, it appears that many members of Congress are serious about reducing the likelihood of future disruptive trade actions without congressional involvement.
I will, in future updates, summarize other legislative proposals, including a bill that would expand the president’s authority to order trade restrictions.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: The UK trade agreement, a template for future trade deals?
The UK deal may signal relaxation of the heaviest tariffs. The suspension of the reciprocal tariffs greater than 10% - remember, 57 countries were hit with that - ends on July 9. But it could be extended. If more deals like the one with the UK are struck, the suspensions may continue to permit more agreements - relieving global markets of considerable worry.
US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.
US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.