Trade Cases

OECD: Markets at Risk from Excess Capacity and Trade Actions
Written by Sandy Williams
March 27, 2019
Steel markets are facing “considerable downside risk” as excess capacity continues to a be a major challenge for the global steel industry.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found that global steelmaking capacity (in nominal crude terms) was nearly unchanged in 2018 at 2.234 billion metric tons, after declining in the previous two years. The gap between steel capacity and production remained high at 425.5 million tons in 2018.
Numerous new capacity investments have been started or are in the planning phases around the world. If those projects are completed, OECD projects that steelmaking capacity could increase by 4-5 percent between 2019 and 2021, in the absence of any plant closures.
At the 86th session of the OECD Steel Committee, Vice Chairman Jai Motwane expressed the committee’s concerns about “low growth prospects for the global economy and global steel markets.”
Market conditions fell sharply in 2018. Global GDP growth forecasts were revised downward to 3.3. percent for 2019 and 3.4 percent for 2020. Accelerated steel price growth fell in the second half of the year, wiping out first half gains. Global production increased while demand softened in most steel-consuming economies.
Steel trade declined in most major steel producing economies in 2018 due to a significant increase in trade actions in the global steel market. In the U.S., Section 232 steel tariffs contributed to a host of retaliatory and protective measures, which multiplied across the globe.
Structural imbalances in the market, like use of subsidies, continue to persist.
Motwane called for the G-20-led Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity to swiftly implement agreed policy actions to eliminate excess capacity and market-distorting support measures.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.

Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.

Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.