Trade Cases
OECD: Markets at Risk from Excess Capacity and Trade Actions
Written by Sandy Williams
March 27, 2019
Steel markets are facing “considerable downside risk” as excess capacity continues to a be a major challenge for the global steel industry.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found that global steelmaking capacity (in nominal crude terms) was nearly unchanged in 2018 at 2.234 billion metric tons, after declining in the previous two years. The gap between steel capacity and production remained high at 425.5 million tons in 2018.
Numerous new capacity investments have been started or are in the planning phases around the world. If those projects are completed, OECD projects that steelmaking capacity could increase by 4-5 percent between 2019 and 2021, in the absence of any plant closures.
At the 86th session of the OECD Steel Committee, Vice Chairman Jai Motwane expressed the committee’s concerns about “low growth prospects for the global economy and global steel markets.”
Market conditions fell sharply in 2018. Global GDP growth forecasts were revised downward to 3.3. percent for 2019 and 3.4 percent for 2020. Accelerated steel price growth fell in the second half of the year, wiping out first half gains. Global production increased while demand softened in most steel-consuming economies.
Steel trade declined in most major steel producing economies in 2018 due to a significant increase in trade actions in the global steel market. In the U.S., Section 232 steel tariffs contributed to a host of retaliatory and protective measures, which multiplied across the globe.
Structural imbalances in the market, like use of subsidies, continue to persist.
Motwane called for the G-20-led Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity to swiftly implement agreed policy actions to eliminate excess capacity and market-distorting support measures.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.
Commerce launches investigation into imports of coated flat-rolled steel
On Thursday, the Department of Commerce announced it would initiate investigations into coated steel imports from ten countries.
Op-Ed: Despite misclassification games, import data supports surge of Mexican conduit
Barry Zekelman, chairman and CEO of Zekelman Industries, says the import data unquestionably supports the fact that imports of Mexican conduit have been surging into the US market.
Leibowitz: The Mexican steel import “surge”—and what to do about it
US presidential campaigns frequently sport an “air of unreality.” No more so than the 2024 campaign, where superlatives fly around like mosquitos. Steel trade has been a feature of political discourse for at least half a century now. Just last week, it proceeded to a new level of “unreality.” Four senators - Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.) - wrote a “bipartisan” letter attacking Mexican exports of steel to the United States. They framed it as a “surge” in US steel imports from Mexico. To address this “surge,” the Senators urge the imposition of 25% tariffs on all steel imports from Mexico.