Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Supreme Court Declines Case Challenging Section 232—For Now
Written by Lewis Leibowitz
June 25, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
The lawsuit filed almost exactly one year ago challenging Section 232 has been turned down by the Supreme Court. AIIS and the other plaintiffs in the case, which was decided in favor of the government last March, asked the Supreme Court to grant an extraordinary petition to take the case before the normally required appellate review (in this case, by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Without comment, the Supreme Court denied the petition yesterday.
The Court’s refusal to push the process is hardly a surprise. While the Supreme Court has the authority to take a case prior to normal appellate review, it very rarely does so. U.S. v. Nixon, the famous “Nixon tapes” case, is one that comes to mind. But that was indeed extraordinary.
The denial of the petition by itself only means that the case will take longer to reach the Supreme Court. None of the Justices explained the Court’s decision—that is customary. Therefore, the denial is not a comment on the merits of the case. Moreover, the decision in the Gundy case, which I mentioned a couple of days ago, clearly suggests that the issue of unconstitutional “delegation” of legislative power is a very current issue with the Court.
It is probably fruitless to speculate on anything but the timing of the case. For those who were hoping for the steel tariffs to go away soon, those hopes are likely to be frustrated by this case. The Court of Appeals decision will take the better part of a year to reach a conclusion. If the Court of Appeals concludes that binding Supreme Court precedent controls the constitutional issue, the Supreme Court will get another crack at the case. And, if the Court of Appeals finds that the 1976 case of Algonquin is not controlling precedent, the government surely will appeal that decision to the Supreme Court. By the time the high court decides the case, the 2020 election is likely to be over.
In the meantime, it will be worth following the litigation over 232. No telling what might happen.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Lewis Leibowitz
Read more from Lewis LeibowitzLatest in Trade Cases
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.
Commerce launches investigation into imports of coated flat-rolled steel
On Thursday, the Department of Commerce announced it would initiate investigations into coated steel imports from ten countries.
Op-Ed: Despite misclassification games, import data supports surge of Mexican conduit
Barry Zekelman, chairman and CEO of Zekelman Industries, says the import data unquestionably supports the fact that imports of Mexican conduit have been surging into the US market.