Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
On Monday, the Supreme Court announced its decision not to take the case of American Institute for International Steel (AIIS) v. United States, a case challenging the constitutionality of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended. This effectively ends the challenge on that ground to Section 232. Other challenges are still around and are likely to result in court decisions this year and next.
AIIS argued that the statute delegated legislative authority to the president to decide whether to impose tariffs and other trade restrictions without limitation, or, as lawyers say, without “intelligible principles.” This was always a steep hill to climb, for two reasons—first, the last time the Supreme Court struck down a statute because it delegated too much power to the president was in 1935, when it struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act, the signature New Deal legislation.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Second, the Supreme Court already had decided in a 1976 case that Section 232 as it then existed was constitutional because there were “intelligible principles” limiting the president’s authority. Both the Court of International Trade and its appellate court, the Federal Circuit, ruled that the 1976 Supreme Court case was binding precedent that no lower court could ignore. If the doctrine was going to succeed, the Supreme Court itself would have to overrule that old case. On Monday, we found out that the Court was not going to do that.
Section 232 is far from out of the woods. There are bills in Congress to constrict the president’s authority under Section 232 to impose tariffs and other restrictions in the name of eliminating a threat “to impair the national security.” Perhaps more immediate and more likely are several court cases that challenge the president’s actions on steel and aluminum. More cases are likely to follow, if the secretary of Commerce and the president further restrict imports in pending cases on autos and auto parts, transformers and components, mobile cranes and vanadium. There will also undoubtedly be litigation if the president reimposes aluminum tariffs on Canada, as he has recently threatened.
The courts have not been kind to the current administration’s signature initiatives and steel and aluminum may also fall victim. Recently, the Supreme Court, in setting aside the elimination of the DACA program, made new and expansive law on judicial review of executive decisions.
Litigation is always uncertain, of course, and no predictions regarding the outcome of any case will be made here. But for those who follow these cases, there are straws in the wind.
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Lewis LeibowitzRead more from Lewis Leibowitz
Latest in Steel Products
Leibowitz: The future of WTO dispute settlement in the MC 13 conference
This week, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial conference convenes in Abu Dhabi, UAE. There are many issues on the WTO’s plate. The question is whether any resolution of these matters is likely or even possible. One of the most important issues is the future of the dispute settlement system, which has been rendered impotent […]
US rig count expands, Canada slips
Rig counts in the US and Canada were mixed again for the week ended Feb. 23. The US saw totals move higher, while Canadian rig figures slipped week on week (w/w), Baker Hughes’ latest data shows. US rigs The number of active rotary rigs in the US expanded by five to 626 from the previous […]
North American auto assemblies recover in January
North American auto assemblies recovered in January after a usual seasonal slowdown at year-end, according to LMC Automotive data. The result was driven by improved production across the region vs. December’s output.
Nucor board OKs new rebar micro mill for Pacific Northwest
Nucor Corp. announced plans to build a new rebar micro mill in the Pacific Northwest.
US rig count slips, Canada higher
Rig counts in the US and Canada were mixed again for the week ended Feb. 16. The US saw totals move down, while Canadian rig figures ticked up week on week (w/w), Baker Hughes’ latest data shows.