Trade Cases
USTR Tai Suggests New Trade Tools are Needed
Written by Sandy Williams
May 14, 2021
Will the Section 232 tariffs be modified in some way in the near future? That is what U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai appeared to suggest during testimony before the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday.
Tai told the committee that the Biden administration seeks a better tool for addressing trade than the 1962 Trade Expansion Act. The act includes the Section 232 national security measures that the Trump administration used to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.
“What I would propose is that we need 2021 tools for addressing the 2021 challenges we have, rather than relying on 1962 tools and retrofitting them for the challenges we have now,” Tai said.
Although the steel industry still strongly supports maintaining the status quo on Section 232, the Biden administration has received increasing pressure from manufacturers to terminate the tariffs, which they say are increasing costs and making it harder to compete with foreign rivals.
Tai said that the former administration “did the best they could, given the tools that we have existing on the books.”
“Part of the tensions that have risen over this important trade remedy is the discordance between the authority provided and the nature of the problem we’re dealing with,” Tai said. “The steel and aluminum tariffs that have really roiled our economy were necessary to address a global overcapacity problem, driven largely but not solely by China.”
Tai did not offer any suggestion on how to replace the Trade Act or Section 232, but said she was “open to improving and perfecting the tools we have to make them more effective.” She emphasized, however, that the USTR will continue to use them in the near term to continue to protect the steel and aluminum industries.
“Clearly we have a commitment to being a strong country that is able to produce steel for itself,” Tai said.
The EU is set to double retaliatory tariffs to 50% in June in response to Section 232 and the Boeing-Airbus dispute. Tai said the administration is working with the EU and United Kingdom to resolve the disputes and address overcapacity in the steel and aluminum sectors.
In her opening remarks to the Senate, Tai was optimistic about revising U.S. trade policy. “We are turning the page on erratic trade policies. USTR’s goal is to pursue smarter policies that expand global market opportunities while enforcing global trade standards and ensuring that trading partners live up to their commitments.”
By Sandy Williams, Sandy@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.