Trade Cases
Congressional Steel Caucus Urges More Action on Imports
March 1, 2023
The Congressional Steel Caucus (CSC) called on President Biden to keep Section 232 tariffs in place and to explore additional protections as well.
“We encourage the Biden administration to continue to maintain the Section 232 tariffs and quotas, ensure strong trade remedy laws that address unfair trade practices, and protect our environment from high-emission foreign steel production,” the CSC said to President Biden in a letter on Feb. 22.
The bipartisan congressional group urged updating US trade remedy laws “to reflect 21st-century challenges and establishing rules and standards for a resilient domestic steel industry.”
The caucus cited several key factors behind their recommendations. Among them were “government-supported overcapacity in global markets,” duty and tariff circumvention, geopolitical uncertainty, and supply chain risks that “threaten the erosion of the US manufacturing base.”
Additionally, the CSC lauded the US industry’s commitment to sustainable, low-carbon steel production. “However, these advancements are compromised every time a foreign government or producer seeks competitive advantage by cutting corners on sustainability,” the caucus added.
Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association, applauded the action taken by the caucus.
“We are proud to work with the Congressional Steel Caucus to encourage the Biden administration to maintain and enforce America’s trade laws as it encourages our trading partners to follow our roadmap for sustainable steel production,” he said in a statement provided to SMU.
Likewise, Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), supported the action.
“We are pleased and grateful that so many members of Congress have championed the American steel industry and our workers by supporting the preservation of the existing steel tariffs,” he said in a statement to SMU.
“We appreciate that the members of the Steel Caucus continue to recognize that the new investments American steelmakers are making, and our global leadership in clean steel production, would be at risk if the existing Section 232 program does not remain in place,” he added.
Dempsey said the group looks forward to continuing work with the caucus to combat “unfair trade” and the “global trade distortions” in steel that continue to threaten the industry.
By Ethan Bernard, ethan@steelmarketupdate.com
Latest in Trade Cases

Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.

Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.

Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...

CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...

U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.