Trade Cases
Commerce finds Vietnam still a 'non-market economy', domestic steel interests cheer
Written by Ethan Bernard
August 2, 2024
The US Department of Commerce has announced its determination that Vietnam will keep its classification as a “non-market economy” (NME) country.
As a result, the methodology used for calculating US antidumping duties (ADs) on imports from the country will remain the same, Commerce said.
“Despite Vietnam’s substantive reforms made over the past 20 years, the extensive government involvement in Vietnam’s economy distorts Vietnamese prices and costs and ultimately render them unusable for the purpose of calculating US antidumping duties,” the department said in a statement on Friday.
“Commerce will continue to use market-based prices and costs from a country at a comparable level of economic development to Vietnam that produces comparable merchandise to calculate ADs,” the statement continued.
The department said it received more than 36,000 pages of comments from US domestic industries as well as the government of Vietnam. The determination was based on a “thorough evaluation” of all the comments collected.
Recall that Commerce said in October it would begin reviewing Vietnam’s NME status shortly after Vietnam filed an official request to be considered “a market economy.”
AISI, SMA respond
Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), earlier this year testified before Commerce on this issue. He applauded today’s decision.
“Granting market economy status to Vietnam was not justified by the facts – given the significant role of state-owned enterprises in the Vietnamese economy,” Dempsey said in statement.
He cited Vietnam’s role “in circumventing US trade law orders on goods from China and other countries, its continued currency manipulation, its ongoing export restrictions on steelmaking raw materials, and its other trade restrictive practices.”
Likewise, Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), praised the decision.
“I think this confirms what most people already know is that Vietnam is nowhere near ready to become a market economy,” Bell told SMU.
He said the country still has state-controlled enterprises and close links to China’s government. “And they have a lot of work to do on their environmental, labor, and human rights issues.”
“So we want to thank Commerce for coming to a logical conclusion,” Bell said.
Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases
Update on CORE steel trade case and dates to watch
SMU has compiled a list of key dates to watch out for in the expansive trade case filed last week targeting corrosion-resistant steel imports.
Commerce: Sizable Chinese pipe subsidies will continue if US duties expire
The Commerce Department said imports of Chinese pipe will continue to benefit from significant government subsidies if the US countervailing duty (CVD) order against them is allowed to expire.
Domestic steelmakers push back on Ternium’s 232 exclusion requests
Ternium USA Inc. has requested a host of Section 232 tariff exclusions since the US reimposed the duties on Mexican steel earlier this summer. Domestic steelmakers, however, are pushing back.
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.