Trade Cases

Canacero disputes US allegations of Mexican steel export threat
Written by Ethan Bernard
January 19, 2025
Mexican steel trade association Canacero said steel exports from the Latin American country into the US do not pose a threat.
And claims that Mexican steel exports have been the driver of US plant closures and layoffs are “unfounded,” the association said.
“On the contrary, the US greatly benefits from steel trade flows and has a surplus with Mexico,” Canacero said in a statement on Friday.
Citing US government figures, Canacero said the average US surplus has been 1.2 million tons per year from 2015-23. And the US surplus will increase to 2.4 million tons in 2024, or $4.1 billion.
“In 2024, US export tonnage to Mexico rose 10% compared to 2023 – an increase of 23% compared to the 2015-17 average,” Canacero said. “By contrast, Mexico’s exports to the US have fallen 13% compared to 2023, bringing us back to 2015 levels.”
Canacero’s statement comes as some US politicians, boosted by voices in the domestic industry, argue that there has been a “surge” of Mexican steel imports into the US. Some background on the issue can be found here.
The incoming Trump administration, meanwhile, has floated the possibility of enacting tariffs against both Canada and Mexico. Recall, too, that the USMCA agreement is up for periodic review in 2026.
Canacero rebuts circumvention claims
Canacero said allegations of Mexico allowing duty circumvention by China and other countries are “mistaken.”
“From January to October 2024, exports of steel of Chinese origin amounted to only 578 tons, or 0.02% of total Mexican steel exports to the US during this period,” the association said.
Mexico has enacted steel tariff measures of up to 50% against countries with which it has no Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Canacero noted. The country has also implemented anti-dumping duties.
Fortress North America
Canacero said the US, Mexico, and Canada should “continue strengthening North American integration” to better protect themselves against imports from China and Southeast Asian nations.
“We strongly believe that, by working together, our three nations can enhance regional cooperation and mitigate potential national security threats on behalf of a greater USMCA region,” the association said.
The full text of the statement with additional data can be found here.

Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases

Commerce sets initial CVDs of 0-140% in coated steel trade case
The Commerce Department on Tuesday issued preliminary subsidy rates in the corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) trade case. The agency set minimal countervailing duty (CVD) rates for Brazil and Mexico, mostly high rates for Vietnam, and low rates for Canada, except for one privately held distributor. Commerce assigned that company, Nova Steel, and a handful of Vietnamese […]

Tampa Steel Conference: Trade attorney says brace for turbulence
Steel and aluminum have been identified as high priorities for trade

Trudeau, Trump agree to push tariffs until March
Canada fights back, a little As this article was about to be posted, Canada had not backed down to US President Trump’s 25% tariffs coming for Canadian goods at the stroke of midnight. In fact, the Government of Canada had pushed back, saying it would implement 25% tariffs on $155 billion worth of US products […]

US shelves Mexico tariffs until next month
“It is not by imposing tariffs that problems are resolved, but by talking and dialoguing,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said.

Leibowitz on trade: How much will the Trump tariffs hurt the US? How much will they help?
The benefits from higher tariffs are speculative and unproven. The disruptions caused by tariffs and other trade restrictions are better documented and cannot be rationally denied. For the tariffs to be good policy, the Trump argument must therefore be sure that the benefits to the US exceed the cost of these disruptions. Otherwise, we have madness masquerading as policy.