Trade Cases

Trade groups push for steel tariffs, no exclusions
Written by Stephanie Ritenbaugh
March 10, 2025
Five organizations representing the American steel industry wrote to President Trump to support reinstating 25% tariffs on steel imports and eliminating exclusions under the program.
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and US OCTG Manufacturers Association (USOMA) sent a joint letter Monday. It says the industry supports steel tariffs under Section 232 and called for “the elimination of the steel Section 232 exclusion process that has been exploited as a loophole by foreign producers seeking to avoid tariffs.”
The penalties are expected to be reinstated on Wednesday, March 12.
In a letter dated March 10, the groups said they supported the first iteration of Section 232 implemented in 2018 during Trump’s first term. This move “allowed the American steel industry to restart idled mills, rehire laid-off workers and begin investing tens of billions of dollars in new and upgraded plants,” the groups wrote.
However, as exemptions were granted for some countries and products, Section 232 weakened, they said.
“The degradation of the Section 232 tariffs and out-of-control global excess steel production led to increases in steel imports and imports of downstream derivative products, once again threatening the viability of domestic steel producers and US national security.”
“We are also concerned that certain countries have been working in concert with the Chinese government-owned steel industry to evade duties against China and ask that you consider taking swift additional tariff action against imports from these countries if import surges occur after March 12,” the letter continued.
Last week, a similar action was taken by the chief executives of nine US steel mills, who wrote to urge President Trump to put into effect uniform 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum without exceptions.
The Section 232 tariffs are separate from the 25% blanket duties that were slapped on Canada and Mexico last week, only to be rescinded days later.
SMU’s parent company, CRU Group, noted last week the goals of reducing the US trade deficit or re-shoring manufacturing will not be easy to achieve with tariffs alone.
“The Trump 1.0 tariffs appeared to have little positive effect on the US manufacturing, partly because they hurt export competitiveness,” CRU Group said. “Tariffs push up import costs for domestic manufacturers, making goods more expensive and squeezing real consumer demand. They also reduce competitiveness for exporters – particularly as tariffs tend to lead to a stronger dollar, and trade partners retaliate with their own tariffs against US goods.

Stephanie Ritenbaugh
Read more from Stephanie RitenbaughLatest in Trade Cases

Canada moves to curb steel imports with TRQs
Canada has implemented tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) on steel imports to help stabilize its domestic market.

Commerce launches probe into unfairly traded rebar imports
Here are the details and a case timeline for the rebar trade case recently initiated by the Commerce Department.

Leibowitz on Trade: Who is winning the tariff debate?
Most economists will tell you that universal tariffs will result in inflation and reduce demand, causing a recession or worse. (After all, this is what happened in the 1930s). It is a rare product that is so essential that demand will not go down if prices go up.

Canadian steel industry fears thousands of job losses from US tariffs
The Canadian steel industry is bracing for thousands of job losses because of US tariffs, the Canadian Steel Producers Association says.

US, Mexico mull tariff-rate quota system: Report
Could the US and Mexico end up with a tariff-rate quota system?