Trade Cases
Trade groups push for steel tariffs, no exclusions
Written by Stephanie Ritenbaugh
March 10, 2025
Five organizations representing the American steel industry wrote to President Trump to support reinstating 25% tariffs on steel imports and eliminating exclusions under the program.
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and US OCTG Manufacturers Association (USOMA) sent a joint letter Monday. It says the industry supports steel tariffs under Section 232 and called for “the elimination of the steel Section 232 exclusion process that has been exploited as a loophole by foreign producers seeking to avoid tariffs.”
The penalties are expected to be reinstated on Wednesday, March 12.
In a letter dated March 10, the groups said they supported the first iteration of Section 232 implemented in 2018 during Trump’s first term. This move “allowed the American steel industry to restart idled mills, rehire laid-off workers and begin investing tens of billions of dollars in new and upgraded plants,” the groups wrote.
However, as exemptions were granted for some countries and products, Section 232 weakened, they said.
“The degradation of the Section 232 tariffs and out-of-control global excess steel production led to increases in steel imports and imports of downstream derivative products, once again threatening the viability of domestic steel producers and US national security.”
“We are also concerned that certain countries have been working in concert with the Chinese government-owned steel industry to evade duties against China and ask that you consider taking swift additional tariff action against imports from these countries if import surges occur after March 12,” the letter continued.
Last week, a similar action was taken by the chief executives of nine US steel mills, who wrote to urge President Trump to put into effect uniform 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum without exceptions.
The Section 232 tariffs are separate from the 25% blanket duties that were slapped on Canada and Mexico last week, only to be rescinded days later.
SMU’s parent company, CRU Group, noted last week the goals of reducing the US trade deficit or re-shoring manufacturing will not be easy to achieve with tariffs alone.
“The Trump 1.0 tariffs appeared to have little positive effect on the US manufacturing, partly because they hurt export competitiveness,” CRU Group said. “Tariffs push up import costs for domestic manufacturers, making goods more expensive and squeezing real consumer demand. They also reduce competitiveness for exporters – particularly as tariffs tend to lead to a stronger dollar, and trade partners retaliate with their own tariffs against US goods.
Stephanie Ritenbaugh
Read more from Stephanie RitenbaughLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.