Trade Cases

Trump tariffs face battle as court rejects legality
Written by Laura Miller
May 29, 2025
The “on again, off again” Trump tariff train continues to chug along, with several important court rulings this week.
CIT rules many Trump tariffs are unlawful
The US Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on Wednesday that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) invoked by Trump does not give the president “unbounded authority” to “impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world.”
The CIT ultimately said, “IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders” and ordered that they be blocked. This includes the 10% global baseline tariff, reciprocal tariffs, and drug-related tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico.
The court’s ruling does not affect Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, and autos. Those will remain in place regardless of the courts’ final decisions.
Trump administration appeals
The Trump administration immediately appealed the court order Thursday morning.
“IEEPA clearly authorizes these tariffs,” the administration argued in its appeal.
The appeal included declarations from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative Jamieson Lee Greer. The cabinet members describe what they deem would be “catastrophic harm to American foreign policy and national security that would ensue from granting the relief.”
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the administration’s request, providing an immediate administrative stay while the courts consider the cases.
This means the worldwide, retaliatory, and trafficking tariffs remain in effect for the time being.
How much have US importers paid in Trump tariffs?
Through April, the US has collected over $13 billion in IEEPA-related tariffs, excluding Section 232. That includes $7.89 billion on goods imported from China and Hong Kong, $2.87 billion on goods from Mexico, $1 billion from imported Canadian goods, and $1.23 billion from 10% reciprocal tariffs.
As for Section 232 tariffs, US Customs and Border Protection collected $3 billion in levies in the first four months of this year. That included $1.26 billion from steel, $767 million from aluminum, and $1.15 billion from automobile imports.
Key takeaways for steel
The Section 232 tariffs remain unaffected by this week’s rulings and are not expected to be eliminated anytime soon. Steel importers should continue anticipating paying the 25% levies.
The blanket, reciprocal, and trafficking tariffs were briefly off again this week but are now back on for now. Importers should continue to expect to pay these taxes but keep a close eye on developments from the courts.

Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.