Trade Cases

Trump tariffs face battle as court rejects legality
Written by Laura Miller
May 29, 2025
The “on again, off again” Trump tariff train continues to chug along, with several important court rulings this week.
CIT rules many Trump tariffs are unlawful
The US Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on Wednesday that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) invoked by Trump does not give the president “unbounded authority” to “impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world.”
The CIT ultimately said, “IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders” and ordered that they be blocked. This includes the 10% global baseline tariff, reciprocal tariffs, and drug-related tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico.
The court’s ruling does not affect Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, and autos. Those will remain in place regardless of the courts’ final decisions.
Trump administration appeals
The Trump administration immediately appealed the court order Thursday morning.
“IEEPA clearly authorizes these tariffs,” the administration argued in its appeal.
The appeal included declarations from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative Jamieson Lee Greer. The cabinet members describe what they deem would be “catastrophic harm to American foreign policy and national security that would ensue from granting the relief.”
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the administration’s request, providing an immediate administrative stay while the courts consider the cases.
This means the worldwide, retaliatory, and trafficking tariffs remain in effect for the time being.
How much have US importers paid in Trump tariffs?
Through April, the US has collected over $13 billion in IEEPA-related tariffs, excluding Section 232. That includes $7.89 billion on goods imported from China and Hong Kong, $2.87 billion on goods from Mexico, $1 billion from imported Canadian goods, and $1.23 billion from 10% reciprocal tariffs.
As for Section 232 tariffs, US Customs and Border Protection collected $3 billion in levies in the first four months of this year. That included $1.26 billion from steel, $767 million from aluminum, and $1.15 billion from automobile imports.
Key takeaways for steel
The Section 232 tariffs remain unaffected by this week’s rulings and are not expected to be eliminated anytime soon. Steel importers should continue anticipating paying the 25% levies.
The blanket, reciprocal, and trafficking tariffs were briefly off again this week but are now back on for now. Importers should continue to expect to pay these taxes but keep a close eye on developments from the courts.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
