Trade Cases
Pipe Producers File AD/CVD Petition on Welded Pipe
Written by Sandy Williams
January 18, 2018
The American Line Pipe Producers Association filed an antidumping and countervailing duty petition with the Department of Commerce and U.S. International Trade Commission on Wednesday. The group alleges that the dumping of large diameter welded pipe from Canada, Greece, India, China, Korea and Turkey is causing injury to domestic producers. The group also charges that China, India, South Korea and Turkey are benefiting from countervailing government subsidies.
Wiley Rein LLP filed the petition on behalf of association members American Cast Iron Pipe Co., Berg Spiral Pipe Corp./Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Dura-Bond Industries and Stupp Corp., as well as Skyline Steel.
The following dumping margins are alleged:
The products covered by these petitions are welded carbon and alloy steel pipe, more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal diameter (large diameter welded pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, grade, end finish or stenciling. Large-diameter welded pipe may be used to transport oil, gas, steam, slurry or other liquids and for structural purposes, including piling.
“For years, our companies and workers have lost many large projects and massive amounts of sales to dumped and subsidized imports,” said John Stupp, President and CEO of Stupp Bros., Inc., and CEO of petitioner Stupp Corp. “It’s time to stand up for American manufacturing jobs, and to take on these unfairly traded products.”
KeyBanc Capital Markets estimates apparent consumption of large diameter welded line pipe in 2017 was 2.0 million to 2.5 million tons, approximately 55-60 percent of the 3.9 million ton U.S. line pipe market.
Although welded pipe could be covered under the Section 232 steel investigation, Key Banc suggests the action was taken by the producers to prevent foreign bidding for large line pipe projects during the interim. The president has 90 days to consider action on the recommendations provided in the Section 232 report.
“With bidding activity heating up in this market via a healthy backlog of crude and natural gas pipeline projects, we believe U.S. line pipe producers are attempting to prevent any new business from moving offshore,” wrote KeyBanc analysts Phil Gibbs and Tyler Kenyon in a report on Thursday. “Notably, Evraz North America (Canada) has been increasing its presence within the U.S. market following the commissioning of its Regina large diameter pipe mill in 2017.”
Commerce will determine whether to initiate the investigations within 20 days of the filing, and the USITC will reach a preliminary determination of material injury or threat of material injury within 45 days.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.