Trade Cases
CRU: Quotas Would Only Add to the Volatility
Written by Tim Triplett
April 18, 2019
Steel interests in North America and the rest of the world are watching intently to see if the Trump administration grants some tariff relief to Canada and Mexico to clear the way for final approval of the new U.S.-Canada-Mexico Trade Agreement. One possible compromise being discussed (albeit one so far opposed by the U.S. trading partners) is replacing the 25 percent Section 232 tariffs on steel with some form of quota.
Speaking during a webinar hosted by CRU and the CME Group earlier today, CRU Principal Analyst Josh Spoores said quotas may help secure the trade agreement, but will only add to the price volatility plaguing the hot rolled market.
What form the quotas might take is still unknown. There is precedent in quotas on South Korean steel, which limit their exports to the U.S. to 70 percent of historical averages. In the case of Canada and Mexico, it’s more likely the quotas would be set at 100 percent of recent shipments so as not to punish the two nations but to prevent a surge of steel into the U.S. once the tariffs were lifted, Spoores said.
Quotas might help secure the NAFTA 2.0 trade agreement, but will only worsen the volatility in steel shipments and pricing, Spoores predicts. In situations where quotas are set by quarter, such as finished steel from South Korea and slabs from Brazil, imports tend to be front-loaded. The result is a dramatic increase in imports and prices in the first month of each quarter, followed by declines in both as the material is processed and released into the market.
“Quotas would lead to much higher volatility throughout the year,” Spoores said.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America
Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]