Trade Cases
GAO: Commerce Needs to Fix Section 232 Exclusion Process
Written by David Schollaert
September 17, 2020
Importers of steel and aluminum who have been critical of the Commerce Department’s handling of Section 232 exclusion requests have found an ally in the Government Accountability Office. In a report released Tuesday, the GAO called for Commerce to improve and speed up the process it uses to review tariff exclusion requests. The report noted that nearly three-quarters of all steel and aluminum exclusion decisions regarding Section 232 duties failed to meet the DOC’s established timeliness guidelines from March 2018 to November 2019.
GAO’s probe was initiated in April 2019 in response to the 25 percent tariffs imposed by President Trump in March 2018 on imports of steel and aluminum products, citing the Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The administration maintains that surges of unfairly priced imports pose a threat to the domestic metals industries and thus to national security. The DOC established a process to provide relief, or exclusion, from the tariffs to companies that can prove they are dependent on imports of products that are not available in sufficient quality or quantity domestically. The GAO found, however, that the process for exclusion was ladened with obstacles that impeded proper review and timely decisions.
The report noted that the DOC received more than 106,000 requests for exclusions and rejected more than 19,000 of them “prior to decision due to incorrect or incomplete information.” Additionally, the report revealed that the DOC did not take any steps to understand or address the causes of these paperwork errors. Although the DOC did implement some changes to improve timelines, three-quarters of the requests were not addressed within the required guidelines, 841 of those took more than a year to be decided, and there was a backlog of 29,000 requests as of November 2019.
GAO added, “Until Commerce takes additional steps, companies will continue to encounter delays in obtaining relief.” The audit noted that the DOC has failed to address the impact of imposed tariffs, as there is evidence to suggest that U.S. steel and aluminum imports and markets have both seen downward corrections after initial surges. “Evaluating whether the tariffs have achieved the intended goals and how they affect downstream sectors requires more in-depth economic analysis. Without assigning responsibility for conducting regular reviews and documenting the results, Commerce may be unable to consistently assess if adjustments to the tariffs are needed,” the report concluded.
As a result, GAO recommended the DOC take the following steps to improve their process: “Identify, analyze, and respond to factors in the process that may cause submission errors; take steps to improve timeliness of exclusion request decisions and address the backlog; and assign responsibility for reviewing the tariffs’ impact and document the results.”
David Schollaert
Read more from David SchollaertLatest in Trade Cases
Steel industry groups urge House action on LTPF 2.0
Six steel industry organizations have urged House Speaker Mike Johnson to include the Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act in any proposed package of legislation against China’s "unfair" trade practices.
CRU: Poor steel margins continue to push down raw material prices
Both iron ore and coking coal prices fell this week because of resistance from buyers. Iron ore prices have continued to fall throughout the past week, following sharp declines in steel prices in China, given no new policy announcement from the ‘Third Plenum’ meeting.
CRU: Imports cause concern in India and Vietnam
High levels of steel imports, especially from China, in recent months are worrying steel makers in India and Vietnam.
Price: The new greenwashing – subsidies to bail out obsolete, excess capacity
The United Kingdom and other countries are using the “green” label to subsidize bailouts of obsolete, inefficient, and excess capacity that should exit the market. US steelmakers have invested billions of dollars in technologies that curb greenhouse gas output. These investments have been market-based and led by EAF producers such as Nucor, Steel Dynamics, and CMC.
AISI, AISC, University of Massachusetts get ~$6.4M EPA grant
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst have received a grant to enhance emissions reporting for steel construction projects.