Trade Cases

OCTG from Four Countries Now Officially Subject to Import Duties

Written by Laura Miller


Oil country tubular goods (OCTG) imports from four countries will now be subject to fresh antidumping and countervailing duties.

The news comes after the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC) final ruling that the US industry is being harmed by OCTG imports from Argentina, Mexico, Russia, and South Korea that are being sold at less than fair value, as well as by unfairly subsidized imports from both Russia and South Korea.

All five ITC commissioners voted in the affirmative that the US OCTG industry is being harmed by these imports, therefore the US Department of Commerce will apply the AD and CVD rates determined earlier this year to the imports.

‘Critical circumstances’ were alleged against Mexico and Russia, but the ITC made negative findings regarding those imports, therefore AD duties will not be applied retroactively before the case was filed last year.

The US petitioners who originally requested the case include Borusan Mannesmann Pipe US, PTC Liberty Tubulars, US Steel Tubular Products, Welded Tube USA, and the AFL-CIO.

The duties will now apply to hollow steel products of circular cross-section including seamless or welded oil well casing and tubing, as well as OCTG coupling stock, and will remain in place for at least five years. As required by law, the duties will be reviewed after five years to determine if they should be continued or allowed to ‘sunset’ or expire.

The OCTG industry, which in the US has been facing an undersupplied market and steep prices for some time now, is a major consumer of flat-rolled steel and plate. According to data from the ITC, there are 18 OCTG producers in the US with annual shipments valued at $2.886 billion. Apparent US consumption is said to be valued at $5.117 billion.

By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Laura Miller

Read more from Laura Miller

Latest in Trade Cases

Price: How did ‘Buy Clean’ get switched to ‘Buy Dirty’?

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) appropriated more than $4 billion to the General Services Administration (GSA) and Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) for “Buy Clean” programs. The statute makes clear that GSA and FHWA purchases under these programs are limited to those with “substantially lower” emissions. There is no ambiguity in that requirement. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has defined “substantially lower” to mean products with the lowest 20% of embodied emissions when compared to similar materials.

Op-Ed: Strong trade enforcement builds prosperity and security

Tariffs on unfairly traded steel and other products help to stabilize America’s most important industries, safeguard tens of thousands of jobs, and protect national security. My union, the United Steelworkers (USW), never seeks these remedies lightly. And presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, implement them only after diligent investigations documenting the harm that foreign adversaries intentionally inflict upon our country with dumping, overproduction and other kinds of trade cheating. I don’t think Lewis Leibowitz considered these points while criticizing tariffs in his excessively pro-free-trade column, “Where is the voice of the consumer?” on May 5.

Leibowitz on trade: Where is the voice of the consumer?

The election campaign is white-hot right now, and the Biden administration is touting its protectionist message. Just this past week, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) touted this message. In a release entitled “What They are Saying,” USTR quoted many of the usual protectionist groups praising government action against Chinese steel exports and shipbuilding. Consuming industries in the United States, which employ many times the American workers as the industries seeking trade protection, were not mentioned.