Trade Cases
US and EU to Discuss 'Global Arrangement' for Steel and Aluminum
Written by Becca Moczygemba
October 9, 2023
The US and European Union will continue trade talks on Friday, Oct. 20, according to a statement from the European Council.
President Joe Biden will host Charles Michel, president of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, at the White House for a US-EU Summit.
Background
The original Section 232 tariffs that went into effect in March 2018 applied 25% and 10% tariffs, respectively, on specific steel and aluminum imports.
In October 2021, the EU and US met and released a joint statement. The goal: “to re-establish historical transatlantic trade flows in steel and aluminum, and to strengthen their partnership.”
The 2021 arrangement replaced the original tariffs with a tariff rate quota (TRQ) system.
“In a demonstration of renewed trust, and reflecting long-standing security and supply chain ties, the United States will not apply section 232 duties and will allow duty-free importation steel and aluminum from the EU at a historical-based volume and the EU will suspend related tariffs on US products,” the statement said. However, the two sides agreed to continue discussions and conclude them within two years.
Why It Matters
The two sides have a self-imposed Oct. 31 deadline. If they fail to reach an agreement by the deadline, the parties could reimpose tariffs on each other’s goods. And increased tariffs could mean increased prices for US citizens.
“There’s a lot of agreement on both the carbon intensity issue and the excess capacity issue,” Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), told SMU.
Dempsey highlighted that one of the challenges is having both parties, who do things differently, come to an agreement. “Hopefully we’ll make some progress here in the next few weeks,” said the AISI president.
“We hope these discussions will build a framework for continued dialogue toward a meaningful agreement that remains ambitious, particularly in the areas of non-market excess capacity and lowering carbon emissions,” said Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturer’s Association, in an email to SMU.
While progress on Oct. 20 is possible, Dempsey says the US is awaiting data from the International Trade Commission. However, the data will not be available until January 2025. “The data will be used to calculate carbon emissions intensity for domestic steel and aluminum production,” Dempsey said.
Becca Moczygemba
Read more from Becca MoczygembaLatest in Trade Cases
Biden hikes tariffs on Chinese goods, including steel and aluminum
The Biden administration announced a series of actions on Tuesday targeting China’s "unfair" trade policies. These actions will, among other things, make imports of steel and aluminum from the Asian nation even more prohibitive.
Price: How did ‘Buy Clean’ get switched to ‘Buy Dirty’?
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) appropriated more than $4 billion to the General Services Administration (GSA) and Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) for “Buy Clean” programs. The statute makes clear that GSA and FHWA purchases under these programs are limited to those with “substantially lower” emissions. There is no ambiguity in that requirement. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has defined “substantially lower” to mean products with the lowest 20% of embodied emissions when compared to similar materials.
Domestic producers prevail in Japanese tin mill product trade case
A vote on Friday by the International Trade Commission (ITC) ensures that antidumping duties on certain steel sheet imports from Japan will continue for the mid-term.
Op-Ed: Strong trade enforcement builds prosperity and security
Tariffs on unfairly traded steel and other products help to stabilize America’s most important industries, safeguard tens of thousands of jobs, and protect national security. My union, the United Steelworkers (USW), never seeks these remedies lightly. And presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, implement them only after diligent investigations documenting the harm that foreign adversaries intentionally inflict upon our country with dumping, overproduction and other kinds of trade cheating. I don’t think Lewis Leibowitz considered these points while criticizing tariffs in his excessively pro-free-trade column, “Where is the voice of the consumer?” on May 5.
Leibowitz on trade: Where is the voice of the consumer?
The election campaign is white-hot right now, and the Biden administration is touting its protectionist message. Just this past week, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) touted this message. In a release entitled “What They are Saying,” USTR quoted many of the usual protectionist groups praising government action against Chinese steel exports and shipbuilding. Consuming industries in the United States, which employ many times the American workers as the industries seeking trade protection, were not mentioned.