• Skip to main content

    Government/Policy

    Leibowitz on trade: Consumers win one at the ITC

    Written by Lewis Leibowitz


    Last week, steel consumers prevailed in a rare victory over US petitioners in trade cases on tin mill steel products. The US International Trade Commission (ITC) voted 4—0 that Cleveland-Cliffs was neither injured nor threatened with injury by imports of competing products from Canada, China, and Germany. Imports from South Korea were found to be “negligible,” and the investigation on Korean imports was terminated. 

    The case was carefully watched because it pitted a large domestic steel producer (Cliffs) against consumers of tin mill products. The consumers claimed that new antidumping and countervailing duties against imports from the four listed companies would devastate producers of steel cans for food products and containers for many other products.

    Lewis Leibowitz, SMU Contributor

    Lewis Leibowitz

    Read more from Lewis Leibowitz

    Latest in Government/Policy

    Join SMU on Tuesday for a Community Chat with SMA President Philip K. Bell

    Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), will join SMU for a Community Chat on Tuesday, Nov. 17. The live webinar is free for anyone to attend. The recording and slide decks will be available only to SMU subscribers. Bell is plugged into steel and plugged into DC politics, which makes this chat a must-see, especially as we prepare for a new, Democratic-controlled Congress to convene in January.

    Price: Blue wave may rock tariff boat, but some ships like Section 232 aren’t sinking

    The midterms are over, and Democrats will control both chambers of Congress in January. In this space last week, Lewis Leibowitz predicted that President Trump's tariffs, including Section 232, may not last much longer. We disagree. To be sure, the new Congress will change trade policy. It will hold hearings, write bills, and almost certainly revisit the trade dispute with Canada. But the foundation of US trade policy is unlikely to be disturbed. Section 232 and Section 301 are established, court-tested authorities that both parties have used. They are also working.