Trade Cases
Domestic producers prevail in Japanese tin mill product trade case
Written by Laura Miller
May 10, 2024
A vote on Friday by the International Trade Commission (ITC) ensures that antidumping duties on certain steel sheet imports from Japan will continue for the mid-term.
After conducting a five-year sunset review, the ITC voted that imports of tin- and chromium-coated steel sheet from Japan are injuring, or threatening to injure, the domestic market. The agency will release details on its reasoning for the affirmative vote at a later date.
Cleveland-Cliffs, one of the two interested domestic producer parties participating in the trade case, applauded the vote.
“While we are disappointed in their previous ruling on tin mill products, the ITC got this one right,” Cliffs’ chairman, president, and CEO Lourenco Goncalves said in a statement on Friday.
Recall that last year, Cliffs and the United Steelworkers (USW) brought a trade case against tin mill product imports from a host of countries. However, in February, the ITC voted against imposing duties and Cliffs said it had to idle its Weirton, W.Va., mill as a result.
The USW told SMU in an email on Friday it is pleased the ITC voted to uphold the duties.
U.S. Steel was the other participating domestic party. In an emailed statement to SMU, the steelmaker said: “We appreciate the Commission’s vote to continue antidumping duties on Japanese tin mill. The Commission correctly found that unfairly traded Japanese tin mill would harm U.S. Steel and its workers.”
Nippon Steel and JFE Steel were the two interested Japanese parties taking part in the case, and neither could be reached for comment.
Cliffs responds to Friday’s vote
Cliffs used the ITC’s vote to highlight how foreign ownership of American mills could affect domestic trade cases.
The US currently has antidumping duty orders in place on 12 Japanese steel products, and Nippon Steel Corp. (NSC) is Japan’s largest steel and tin mill product producer, Cliffs pointed out.
Goncalves said these facts and the ITC’s decision support their position “that Japan is a bad trade partner with the United States, particularly in steel.”
“It also underscores the importance of American ownership of our steel industry. Had Nippon Steel owned US tin mill production, Nippon could have exerted influence to make it impossible for American companies and workers to correct unfair practices through our US trade laws,” he added.
SMU asked Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel about their future participation in US trade cases once their merger is finalized, which they expect will be in the second half of this year. Nippon did not respond, while USS declined to comment.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
US and Canada expect positive outcomes from tariff negotiations
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that they’ll be formulating a trade deal that works for both nations.
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.