Trade Cases
Bills to Limit Trump's Use of Section 232 Get Bipartisan Support
Written by Sandy Williams
March 7, 2019
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is onboard with an effort to restrict President Trump’s ability to use national security as a reason to impose tariffs. Grassley reportedly has told his staff to work with Sens. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Rob Portman (R-OH) to create legislation that would garner enough Senate support to override a veto by the president.
Two bills have already been introduced to Congress that would curtail presidential authority under Section 232.
The Trade Security Act of 2019, re-introduced by Portman in February, allows Congress to pass a joint resolution of disapproval on tariffs imposed by the president on perceived import threats to national security. It would also call on the Pentagon to conduct national security investigations into the impact of any imports targeted by the president. Commerce would consult with the Pentagon and USTR for recommendations to address any threats. The act would apply to new tariffs only.
The Bicameral Congressional Trade Authority Act of 2019, introduced by Toomey, would require Congress to approve any Section 232 adjustment to imports and would restrict national security probes to “goods with applications in military equipment, energy resources, and/or critical infrastructure.” The Toomey bill would allow Congress to review and repeal current Section 232 restrictions.
Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI), who sponsored similar bills in the House, suggested that the Portman bill would likely have more congressional support.
On Wednesday, the conservative group Americans for Prosperity, backed by Charles Koch, launched a digital ad campaign to urge Republicans and Democrats to support legislation to limit Trump’s authority to impose new tariffs.
“Tariffs are destructive taxes on American producers and consumers. They threaten to undermine the economic growth the Trump administration has encouraged through tax reform and removing regulatory burdens,” said Americans for Prosperity President Tim Phillips.
“Congress should hold an up-or-down vote before tariffs proposed by a president can take effect…. We strongly encourage these senators and representatives to get on board and cosponsor this bipartisan legislation. This is a top trade priority for our organization and we’ll continue to press Congress to make it a reality.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.