Futures

Hot Rolled Futures: Hot Lazy Summer

Written by Jack Marshall


The following article on the hot rolled coil (HRC) steel and financial futures markets was written by Jack Marshall of Crunch Risk LLC. Here is how Jack saw trading over the past week:

Steel

Declining HR spot steepens the HR futures curve even as it shifts lower, but the light is just around the corner.

HR futures markets have seen a drop-off in activity while participants take a wait-and-see approach to putting on new HR futures hedges due to the HR spot price trending lower over the last month after peaking at $510/ST in mid June. The current HR spot hovers around $471/ST. The softer than expected demand and concern this will continue has shifted sentiment and left the HR futures curve lower and a bit steeper than just two weeks back. The declining prices in the nearby futures months have led to some profit-taking by market shorts and a thinning of potential selling interests. Both of which have also led to lower trading volumes. The end of July should bring some more clarity for manufacturing businesses as the Fed unemployment subsidy will sunset, which could lead to more consistent business operation as employment returns to more normal conditions. Futures pricing in 1H’21 reflects improving price expectations with the latest values near $530/ST.

The current HR futures curve out 12 months is about a $54/ST contango (Jul’20 $476/ST, Jun’21 $530/ST), with the nearby month prices having declined the most. Q3’20 and Q4’20 HR futures have dropped about $19/ST from the end of June versus Q1’21 and Q2’21 having dropped about $7/ST each since the end of June. Some of this price weakness can be attributed to the steep monthly decline in the BUS futures settlement for July, which was down by over $40/GT ($278/GT).

Below is a graph showing the history of the CME Group hot rolled futures forward curve. You will need to view the graph on our website to use its interactive features; you can do so by clicking here. If you need assistance with either logging in or navigating the website, please contact us at info@SteelMarketUpdate.com.

Scrap

The early chatter around BUS suggests continued weakness as folks look for an additional $20/GT decline. Last month’s BUS price decline left a few folks surprised. Continued uncertainty surrounding business demand due to Covid-19 and the still low 56 percent capacity utilization rates being quoted for HR production could support the view. However, robust export prices for 80/20 partly due to a weak U.S. dollar could help buoy SHR and BUS prices in the coming month. We have seen a pickup in market inquiries for the BUS. Nearby BUS futures are trading just shy of $280/GT with about a $20-30 contango out to January 2021.

Below is another graph showing the history of the CME Group busheling scrap futures forward curve. To use its interactive features, view the graph on our website by clicking here.

Jakc Marshall, SMU Contrubutor

Jack Marshall

Read more from Jack Marshall

Latest in Futures

HRC futures: ‘Normalcy’ not seen on near-term horizon

Over my years of observing the steel market, there's been a recurring belief that current market disruptions in either the physical spot market or steel futures are temporary anomalies, destined to fade, and that normalcy will soon return. However, the events of the first few weeks of 2024 served as a stark reminder that this expectation seldom materializes, and that the US steel market is still the most volatile steel market in the world.

HRC futures: Understanding and addressing HRC basis risk

It’s no secret that HRC futures have been particularly volatile over the past several years. The most recent instance was the outsized break in the March futures contract early this week. For companies procuring raw material in anticipation of higher prices or even to get ahead on future purchase orders from customers, understanding the relative price of that raw material versus the hot-rolled coil futures curve is important.

HRC futures: A flock of canaries in the mine

Much has happened since we last met on Jan. 4. Cleveland-Cliffs announced a price increase on Jan. 3, lifting the futures market in the morning only for it to finish the day $20-$30 per short ton (st) below those morning highs. On Jan. 4, the futures curve was down another $10-$28/st. And in my column for SMU that evening, I asked a question: Would those aggressive sellers be met with a short-squeeze forcing them to cover, or had the market peaked with the negative price action to start the year the proverbial canary in the coal mine?