Trade Cases

Mexico touts Brazil steel carve out from new Section 232 regime
Written by Michael Cowden
July 11, 2024
The Mexican government said on Thursday that it had negotiated a temporary carve out for Brazilian steel under recently updated Section 232 rules.
Mexico said that the pact would stretch until 2027, by which point all steel exported to the US would have to be “melted and poured” within North America.
“A significant bilateral agreement has been reached to avoid affecting the Mexican steel industry,” the Mexican government said in a statement.
The agreement features “a mechanism ensuring that Brazilian steel processed in Mexico will not be subject to tariffs; that is, the ‘melt and pour’ requirement will not apply to products coming from Brazil,” Mexico added.
The wording of the agreement, and comments collected by SMU from industry sources, indicate that it applies primarily to Brazilian slabs.
Recall that President Joe Biden decreed on Wednesday that steel imports from Mexico would again be subject to 25% Section 232 tariffs – unless they are melted and poured in Mexico, the US, or Canada.
Certain US mills rely heavily on Brazilian slab as substrate or to supplement their own melt. And Brazilian slabs, while subject to a Section 232 quota, are exempt from the 25% tariff.
Likewise, certain Mexican mills also rely heavily not only on slabs melted and poured within the country but also on those sourced from Brazil.
A brief history
Former President Donald Trump in March 2018 introduced 25% Section 232 tariffs on imported steel. To the surprise of many, the national security measure was then extended to include not only offshore imports but material from Canada and Mexico as well.
The Trump administration rescinded Section 232 from Canada and Mexico in May 2019, but this year has seen calls from certain US legislators to re-introduce Section 232 on Mexican steel.

Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases

Commerce sets initial CVDs of 0-140% in coated steel trade case
The Commerce Department on Tuesday issued preliminary subsidy rates in the corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) trade case. The agency set minimal countervailing duty (CVD) rates for Brazil and Mexico, mostly high rates for Vietnam, and low rates for Canada, except for one privately held distributor. Commerce assigned that company, Nova Steel, and a handful of Vietnamese […]

Tampa Steel Conference: Trade attorney says brace for turbulence
Steel and aluminum have been identified as high priorities for trade

Trudeau, Trump agree to push tariffs until March
Canada fights back, a little As this article was about to be posted, Canada had not backed down to US President Trump’s 25% tariffs coming for Canadian goods at the stroke of midnight. In fact, the Government of Canada had pushed back, saying it would implement 25% tariffs on $155 billion worth of US products […]

US shelves Mexico tariffs until next month
“It is not by imposing tariffs that problems are resolved, but by talking and dialoguing,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said.

Leibowitz on trade: How much will the Trump tariffs hurt the US? How much will they help?
The benefits from higher tariffs are speculative and unproven. The disruptions caused by tariffs and other trade restrictions are better documented and cannot be rationally denied. For the tariffs to be good policy, the Trump argument must therefore be sure that the benefits to the US exceed the cost of these disruptions. Otherwise, we have madness masquerading as policy.