Trade Cases

US pols urge 'domestically owned' steel industry

Written by Ethan Bernard


US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.

The two, both members of the Congressional Steel Caucus, addressed the letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday, May 5.

“We write to express our belief that a strong, domestically owned and operated American steel industry is vital to our national security,” the letter stated.  

“If American steel production does not remain robust in peacetime, we risk unreliable supplies of critical steel products to the military in wartime,” the letter continued. “We urge you to consider this as the Department of Treasury assesses the national security risks in any review of foreign direct investment.”

The letter further questioned the logic of foreign ownership of US steel assets.

“Permitting foreign ownership or control of our steel industry risks ceding critical supply chains to foreign companies whose commercial interests may not always align with our national security interests,” the letter said.

It warned against entrusting US companies to foreign “companies that have repeatedly circumvented our trade laws and have dumped large volumes of steel onto our shores.”

The full text of the letter is here.

The letter comes as the USS/Nippon deal is still under governmental consideration. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is conducting a new review of the proposed transaction.

CFIUS is chaired by the Treasury Department, but it is not part of any single agency

Additionally, President Trump has said he is still opposed to a foreign firm owning the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker.

In recent decades, foreign firms have played an increasing role in the US steel industry, including companies like Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal, India’s JSW Steel, and and Japan’s JFE, among many others.

Ethan Bernard

Read more from Ethan Bernard

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’

The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.