Trade Cases

US pols urge 'domestically owned' steel industry
Written by Ethan Bernard
May 6, 2025
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
The two, both members of the Congressional Steel Caucus, addressed the letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday, May 5.
“We write to express our belief that a strong, domestically owned and operated American steel industry is vital to our national security,” the letter stated.
“If American steel production does not remain robust in peacetime, we risk unreliable supplies of critical steel products to the military in wartime,” the letter continued. “We urge you to consider this as the Department of Treasury assesses the national security risks in any review of foreign direct investment.”
The letter further questioned the logic of foreign ownership of US steel assets.
“Permitting foreign ownership or control of our steel industry risks ceding critical supply chains to foreign companies whose commercial interests may not always align with our national security interests,” the letter said.
It warned against entrusting US companies to foreign “companies that have repeatedly circumvented our trade laws and have dumped large volumes of steel onto our shores.”
The full text of the letter is here.
The letter comes as the USS/Nippon deal is still under governmental consideration. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is conducting a new review of the proposed transaction.
CFIUS is chaired by the Treasury Department, but it is not part of any single agency
Additionally, President Trump has said he is still opposed to a foreign firm owning the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker.
In recent decades, foreign firms have played an increasing role in the US steel industry, including companies like Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal, India’s JSW Steel, and and Japan’s JFE, among many others.

Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.

Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.

SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.

CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America