Trade Cases

US pols urge 'domestically owned' steel industry
Written by Ethan Bernard
May 6, 2025
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
The two, both members of the Congressional Steel Caucus, addressed the letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday, May 5.
“We write to express our belief that a strong, domestically owned and operated American steel industry is vital to our national security,” the letter stated.
“If American steel production does not remain robust in peacetime, we risk unreliable supplies of critical steel products to the military in wartime,” the letter continued. “We urge you to consider this as the Department of Treasury assesses the national security risks in any review of foreign direct investment.”
The letter further questioned the logic of foreign ownership of US steel assets.
“Permitting foreign ownership or control of our steel industry risks ceding critical supply chains to foreign companies whose commercial interests may not always align with our national security interests,” the letter said.
It warned against entrusting US companies to foreign “companies that have repeatedly circumvented our trade laws and have dumped large volumes of steel onto our shores.”
The full text of the letter is here.
The letter comes as the USS/Nippon deal is still under governmental consideration. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is conducting a new review of the proposed transaction.
CFIUS is chaired by the Treasury Department, but it is not part of any single agency
Additionally, President Trump has said he is still opposed to a foreign firm owning the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker.
In recent decades, foreign firms have played an increasing role in the US steel industry, including companies like Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal, India’s JSW Steel, and and Japan’s JFE, among many others.

Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.

Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.

Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.